[maintainer update] devel/intellij 9.0.4 -> 10.5.2

2011-11-19 Thread Daniel Dickman
Here's an update of intellij. Highlights of changes are here: http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/whatsnew/index.html Please commit. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/intellij/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -

Re: Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread Brad
On 19/11/11 10:58 PM, John Tate wrote: *** Get JDK 5.0 Update 16 for Solaris x86 packages file: *** jdk-1_5_0_16-solaris-i586.tar.Z *** from http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp or *** http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/5.0_16/index.html That is the time consuming one.

Re: Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread John Tate
I am planning on porting LWJGL anyway (for Minecraft goodness) myself so I need to do this to gain an understanding. On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ted Unangst wrote: > "pkg_add jdk" is so much faster... > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011, John Tate wrote: >> Ports, >> >> In devel/jdk/1.6 the instruction

pcsc update

2011-11-19 Thread Damien Miller
Hi, Is anyone maintaining pcsc-lite? I need a newer version to work on improves smartcard support for OpenSSH. If nobody is maintianing it I can update it myself, but it looks like the new version moves a few things around... -d

Re: Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread Ted Unangst
"pkg_add jdk" is so much faster... On Sun, Nov 20, 2011, John Tate wrote: > Ports, > > In devel/jdk/1.6 the instructions to get > jdk-1_5_0_16-solaris-i586.tar.Z are a bit confusing because the site > is a little vague. A little more detail would be nice, currently I am > talking about these inst

Re: Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread John Tate
>> *** Get JDK 5.0 Update 16 for Solaris x86 packages file: >> ***  jdk-1_5_0_16-solaris-i586.tar.Z >> *** from http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp or >> *** http://java.sun.com/products/archive/j2se/5.0_16/index.html That is the time consuming one. -- www.johntate.org

Re: UPDATE: ircd-ratbox 3.0.7

2011-11-19 Thread Brad
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:10:28AM +0100, Simon Kuhnle wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:10:41PM -0500, Brad wrote: > > An update to ircd-ratbox 3.0.7. > > > > Tested on amd64. > > Builds and runs fine so far on sparc64. > > Did some light testing, could connect via IPv4 and IPv6, > got operat

Re: Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread STeve Andre'
On 11/19/11 21:03, John Tate wrote: Ports, In devel/jdk/1.6 the instructions to get jdk-1_5_0_16-solaris-i586.tar.Z are a bit confusing because the site is a little vague. A little more detail would be nice, currently I am talking about these instructions to me the user from make install. *** Y

Instruction a bit confusing

2011-11-19 Thread John Tate
Ports, In devel/jdk/1.6 the instructions to get jdk-1_5_0_16-solaris-i586.tar.Z are a bit confusing because the site is a little vague. A little more detail would be nice, currently I am talking about these instructions to me the user from make install. *** You must manually fetch the distributio

UPDATE: graphics/asymptote

2011-11-19 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Hi, This update package asymptote to the latest release 2.15. Tested on amd64. Comments ? OK ? -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/asymptote/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.10

UPDATE: editors/texmaker

2011-11-19 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
Hi, This update package texmaker to the latest release 3.1. Tested on amd64. Comments ? OK ? -- Alexandr Shadchin Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/texmaker/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -r1.14 Mak

Re : PORT : srm

2011-11-19 Thread Dédé Gerard
I'm really sorry, I sent you a bad archive without the patch. The new one is the good archive. Really sorry De : Dédé Gerard À : "ports@openbsd.org" Envoyé le : Samedi 19 Novembre 2011 20h10 Objet : PORT : srm I have ported srm to OpenBSD, and I would like

Re: courier-imap and rc.d

2011-11-19 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:06:58PM +0200, Liviu Daia wrote: > Is anybody using the new rc.d scripts to start courier-imap or > courier-pop3 over SSL? The problem is the corresponding rc.d scripts > are named courier_imap-ssl and courier_pop3-ssl, but "-" is not a > legal character in shell var

Re: PORT : srm

2011-11-19 Thread Remi Pointel
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:10:43 + (GMT) Dédé Gerard wrote: > I have ported srm to OpenBSD, and I would like you to add it to the cvs > repository. > Is joined to this mail an archive of the folder. > I tested it in two amd64 computers with SATA and IDE hard disks on OpenBSD > 5.0 -current, and

PORT : srm

2011-11-19 Thread Dédé Gerard
I have ported srm to OpenBSD, and I would like you to add it to the cvs repository. Is joined to this mail an archive of the folder. I tested it in two amd64 computers with SATA and IDE hard disks on OpenBSD 5.0 -current, and it's working correctly. Sincerely, Maxime srm.tar.gz Description: GNU

courier-imap and rc.d

2011-11-19 Thread Liviu Daia
Is anybody using the new rc.d scripts to start courier-imap or courier-pop3 over SSL? The problem is the corresponding rc.d scripts are named courier_imap-ssl and courier_pop3-ssl, but "-" is not a legal character in shell variable names, so courier_imap-ssl_flags and courier_pop3-ssl_flags ca

Re: update emulators/x48

2011-11-19 Thread Brad
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 02:26:21PM -0500, Brad wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:10:50PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:55:36 -0500, Brad wrote: > > > On 09/11/11 11:23 AM, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > > > > Right now, this port doesn't even work for me due to some display bug,

Re: p2k11 changes

2011-11-19 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Of course, it's always better with actual benchmarks. > In normal cases, the dependency checking will be often twice > as fast. > > Ways worse in some pathological cases: > > make package in lang/php/5.2 > before: 3m06s > after: 1m06s > -> /3 > > make print-package-signature from the top-level: >

Re: p2k11 changes

2011-11-19 Thread Marc Espie
Of course, it's always better with actual benchmarks. In normal cases, the dependency checking will be often twice as fast. Ways worse in some pathological cases: make package in lang/php/5.2 before: 3m06s after: 1m06s -> /3 make print-package-signature from the top-level: before: 230m21s after:

您好p4u5542

2011-11-19 Thread mail...@tw.mtf.news.yahoo.com
ko 寄了一則文�� 給�� 喔!! 給您的留言: 您好.我司/开各类[禾兑]票! ��/线:135-018-32328王生wmt2p31jhy58jgc 您好p4u5542 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!1K84p1yREQXRDO9YOXH0EfAuoaYkEjm18Q--/article?mid=1 Yahoo!奇摩時尚 �� 的時尚.品味.生活新體驗。 http://tw.fashion.yahoo.com/ 版權所有 Yah

p2k11 changes

2011-11-19 Thread Marc Espie
I spent most of last week working on speed improvements in the package creation process, with nice results. print-package-signature and out-of-date are now about twice as fast. packages with big dependency tree and no wantlib build very much faster (the new meta/* stuff is a proof of that). port