Re: python 2.6 update and default

2010-06-23 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:13:26PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned the > > python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the up

VEALA,PRUEBELA,ENAMORESE Y LLEVESELA HOY MISMO.

2010-06-23 Thread TU NOTEBOOK(4500PESOS)
Por no usar remato computadora ACER PORTATIL modelo 5102 WLMI en excelente estado todo le sirve. CARACTERISTICAS. * AMD Turion64 x2 TL-50 doble nucleo. (1.6 GHz, 512 KB L2 cache total, 256 KB on each core) * 1.5 GB de memoria RAM 533 MHz DDR2 * 100GB DE DISCO DURO * 15.4-pulga

Re: python 2.6 update and default

2010-06-23 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned the > python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the update as well > as moving the default. > I've not removed 2.5 for the time

Re: python 2.6 update and default

2010-06-23 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:01:22PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned the > > python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the up

Re: python 2.6 update and default

2010-06-23 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:06:02PM +0100, Federico G. Schwindt wrote: > Hi, > > Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned the > python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the update as well > as moving the default. > I've not removed 2.5 for the time

python 2.6 update and default

2010-06-23 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
Hi, Since the plan is to make 2.6 the default, some people have mentioned the python update posted on ports@ some time ago, so below is the update as well as moving the default. I've not removed 2.5 for the time being as some have shown some concerns and we can always kill it later. So if yo

Re: update: graphics/camlimages 3.0.2 (gtk+1)

2010-06-23 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:07:01PM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:06:09 +0200 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse > wrote: > > > test -z "/usr/local/lib/ocaml/site-lib/camlimages" || mkdir -p -- > > "/usr/ports/pobj/camlimages-3.0.2/fake-sparc64/usr/local/lib/ocaml/site-lib/camlimages"

Re: hunspell segfaults

2010-06-23 Thread Edd Barrett
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:02:07PM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:44:24 +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > Build the hunspell package with debug symbols! > > DEBUG=-g make install I just noticed there are newer versions, so I think the first thing we should do here is update th

Re: hunspell segfaults

2010-06-23 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 15:44:24 +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > Build the hunspell package with debug symbols! > DEBUG=-g make install Thanks! $ echo asd > textfile $ /usr/local/bin/hunspell textfile Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb /usr/local/bin/hunspell hunspell.core GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2

Update: samba-3.5.4

2010-06-23 Thread Ian McWilliam
Bug fix release for samba 3.5.4. Release notes: http://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.4.html Ian McWilliam samba-3.5.4.diff Description: Binary data

Re: thunderbird 3.0.5

2010-06-23 Thread Nicolas P. M. Legrand
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > Hi, > > here's a diff for a maintenance/bugfix release of thunderbird. Please > test it if you use it, so far only built on amd64. I'd appreciate > i386/sparc64/ppc reallife testing. built on macppc, used it a bit (pop+ssl, smtp), s

Re: keepassx [was: Re: qmake anyone?]

2010-06-23 Thread Auclair Vincent
>From what I saw, you need to run cmake and not just qmake. The X include path is not correct and that is why is doesn't work. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jiri B. wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:35:30 +0100 > frantisek holop wrote: > >> hmm, on Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 06:16:10PM +0100, Matthie

Re: keepassx [was: Re: qmake anyone?]

2010-06-23 Thread Jiri B.
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:35:30 +0100 frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 06:16:10PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb said > that > > Xtst > > thanks. > > i am trying to port keepassx, but i am hitting a wall: Hi, were you successfull to build keepassx on OpenBSD? Before I searched @ports