Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
Hi
Is anyone working on updating the sqlite3 port to anything > 3.6.19
There's a diff floating around for .22, for after unlock.
What do you mean by fk-support ?
Great! I'll wait
Pour être sûr(e) de recevoir notre newsletter, merci de rajouter
service-clie...@la-correzienne.com à votre carnet d'adresses.
Si vous n'arrivez pas à visualiser cette newsletter, merci de cliquer ici.
La Corrézienne
La Corrézienne rêve d'Ailleurs
"Matières exotiques, savoir faire des antipodes,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:30:18AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Lude wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > in x11/Makefile there is this li
The ports tree is now locked for the 4.7 release. Thanks to everyone
who tested.
Cheers,
Jasper
--
"Intelligence should guide our actions, but in harmony with the
texture of the situation at hand"
-- Francisco Varela
Hi,
On Wed, 17.02.2010 at 18:27:14 +0100, Landry Breuil
wrote:
> Considering the timeframe, i don't think so. Post diffs for -STABLE
> post-unlock... ditto for 2.6. It could have been done ages ago...
sure, but apparently, the port maintainer didn't notice. Nor did I. :(
--
Kind regards,
-
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:06:39PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.5.4 as opposed
> to the current Python 2.5.5.
>
> Reading
>
> http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5.5/NEWS.txt
>
> suggests that Python 2.5.5 is actually a s
Hi,
I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.5.4 as opposed
to the current Python 2.5.5.
Reading
http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.5.5/NEWS.txt
suggests that Python 2.5.5 is actually a security update.
Maybe it's still possible to update Python 2.5, too?
--
Kind reg
Quoting Toni Mueller :
Hi,
who of you is using OpenLDAP in a replicated setup using syncrepl, as
opposed to slurp, and with TLS?
I found that these three configuration statements make the difference
between a working LDAP server and one that hangs on every 'add'
operation, requiring a 'kill -
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:51:42 -0200
Diego Casati wrote:
>
> I don't know if I should proceed with this port since, my fault, I
> just saw that there were an attempt to bring this software last year
> by Giovanni Bechis
You need to figure out why wdel segfaults on amd64 anyway, so you
still have so
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:23:50PM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the reply. I've fixed the issues you've pointed out however
I don't know if I should proceed with this port since, my fault, I
just saw that there were an attempt to bring this software last year
by Giovanni Bechis
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.6.3 as opposed
> to the current Python 2.6.4. Someone said that the tree has already
> frozen, but I don't see a tag in CVS. Anyway, updating to 2.6.4 should
> be really usefu
Hi,
I've just seen that OpenBSD 4.7 *might* contain Python 2.6.3 as opposed
to the current Python 2.6.4. Someone said that the tree has already
frozen, but I don't see a tag in CVS. Anyway, updating to 2.6.4 should
be really useful. Quote from upstream's release notes, available here:
http://www
Hi,
who of you is using OpenLDAP in a replicated setup using syncrepl, as
opposed to slurp, and with TLS?
I found that these three configuration statements make the difference
between a working LDAP server and one that hangs on every 'add'
operation, requiring a 'kill -9' and a restart:
overlay
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:02:35AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Lude wrote:
[...]
> > There is no real problem there with that comma I think. Or is there any
> > difference between those 2 lines?
> >
> > SUBDIR += example_port
> > SUBDIR += example_port,
>
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:44:45 -0200
Diego Casati wrote:
>
> $ cat pkg/DESCR
> wput is a command-line ftp-client that looks like wget but instead of
> downloading, uploads files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers.
>
> Comments ? OK ?
>
amd64.
Builds and installs fine. wput works fine, b
Es Simple, Es Claro.
Descubra la mejor y más economica manera de comunicarse.
Comunicación entre los equipos de su flota gratuita e ilimitada en todo
el país. Equipos totalmente bonificados.
Porque queremos que usted también sea parte de la compañia N°1 de
comunicaciones
Medical & Busines Directories at decent prices
reply here ode...@accuratedata.co.cc
I'll get you all the details and samples.
contact rem...@accuratedata.co.cc for record exclusion.
Hi,
A new port tested on i386.
$ cat pkg/DESCR
wput is a command-line ftp-client that looks like wget but instead of
downloading, uploads files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers.
$
Comments ? OK ?
Cheers,
diego
wput.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
Landry Breuil wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
Hi
Is anyone working on updating the sqlite3 port to anything > 3.6.19
There's a diff floating around for .22, for after unlock.
What do you mean by fk-support ?
I think he means "Foreign keys constraint
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is anyone working on updating the sqlite3 port to anything > 3.6.19
> (fk-support)?
Yes.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is anyone working on updating the sqlite3 port to anything > 3.6.19
There's a diff floating around for .22, for after unlock.
What do you mean by fk-support ?
Landry
Hi
Is anyone working on updating the sqlite3 port to anything > 3.6.19
(fk-support)?
/Markus
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Lude wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > in x11/Makefile there is this line:
> > >
> > > SUBDIR += xscreensaver,
> > >
> > > Maybe simply remove the
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Lude wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > in x11/Makefile there is this line:
> >
> > SUBDIR += xscreensaver,
> >
> > Maybe simply remove the comma at the end?
>
> Why?
well, the whole line is sorta po
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Markus Lude wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in x11/Makefile there is this line:
>
> SUBDIR += xscreensaver,
>
> Maybe simply remove the comma at the end?
Why?
--
Antoine
Hello,
in x11/Makefile there is this line:
SUBDIR += xscreensaver,
Maybe simply remove the comma at the end?
Regards,
Markus
26 matches
Mail list logo
