40 cocheras privadas, 1 TURNO $45.-

2009-07-04 Thread Sex Outlet
Sex Outlet 40 COCHERAS PRIVADAS MAZA 1571 CAPITAL FEDERAL www.sexnos.com.ar 40 cocheras Privadas Habitaciones Peatonales Servicio de Bar Las 24HS Direct TV, Futbol Codificado Habitaciones Con Hidromasajes LCD, DVD y Frigobar A 7 Minutos Del Obelisco A 2 Minutos De Av. San Juan y Boedo De Domingo

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/07/04 12:27, tico wrote: > I'm a big fan of Cyrus. Not because it's always the easiest to set > up, or because the documentation is retard-proof, but because it's > ridiculously scalable, and I've used it for many years without it > ever disappointing me. The more difficult (though flexible

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Simon Bertrang
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:05:07PM +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote: > I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years > using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints. > > I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc. > > Now somebody (important of course) wants web

nasm-2.06

2009-07-04 Thread Sylvestre Gallon
Hi ports@ You can find in attach a diff for nasm-2.06 support. Cheers, -- Sylvestre Gallon (http://devsyl.blogspot.com) Fifth Grade Student @ Epitech & Researcher @ LSE R&D @ Rathaxes (http://www.rathaxes.org) nasm-2.06-patch Description: Binary data

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Chris Bennett
Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it looked like a suitable c

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread tico
Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it looked like a suitable can

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:00:53 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: >> So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as >> does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it >> looked like a suitable candidate. > >I haven't fo

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Zhang Huangbin
On Jul 4, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote: So looking at others needing imap showed me RoundCube. Pretty snazzy looks, renders all that fancy junk that seems to be all the go now and we have a package for it. Vote +1 for Roundcube webmail. So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candida

Re: Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote: > So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as > does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it > looked like a suitable candidate. I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcube looks nice, is easy to get

Question about webmail for users who are not busy on ports prep for 4.6

2009-07-04 Thread Rod Whitworth
I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints. I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc. Now somebody (important of course) wants webmail. I went hunting. About the only webmail server I found that did not n