xfig and siag problems on AMD64

2009-04-07 Thread punosevac72
I would like to report problems with Xfig and Siag packages on OpenBSD 4.4 GENERIC.MP#1812 amd64. Namely, when I try to enter text input mode in Xfig it just dumps the core. Xfig works rock stable on i386 including text input mode. Siag on the another hand has the problem with the background colo

Re: UPD: devel/p5-Moose=>0.73, devel/p5-Class-MOP=>0.80 (was 0.79)

2009-04-07 Thread James Wright
It would be nice if these modules would stabilise soon. Anyway, attached find diffs for Class::MOP to 0.81 and Moose to 0.74. Tested on i386, and pass regress. Changes for Class::MOP 0.81 Tue, April 7, 2009 * Class::MOP * Class::MOP::Class * Class::MOP::Instance * Class::MOP::At

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > they are already marked @conflict so can't be installed together, > teTeX was removed from the tree, and someone reported a problem related > to this. so I think it makes sense. Ok, well lets look at the previous diff and the

UPDATE: www/wordpress 2.7.1

2009-04-07 Thread Mattieu Baptiste
Hi all, Here is an update to the latest wordpress (2.7.1). Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/wordpress/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- Makefile7 May 2008 05:51:35 - 1.16 +++ M

NEW: p5-Coro (and p5-Guard)

2009-04-07 Thread James Wright
Attached are ports of Coro ('the only real threads in perl'), a module to do co-routines and cooperative threading in Perl, and Guard ('safe cleanup blocks'), a dependency for Coro. Both of these are SHARED_ONLY. Coro depends on AnyEvent and Event for the integration with event loops and LWP

Re: UPDATE: security/fwbuilder

2009-04-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
On 7 April 2009 г. 16:31:32 Vadim Zhukov wrote: > On 5 April 2009 г. 19:41:22 Vadim Zhukov wrote: > > On 5 April 2009 г. 18:25:45 Steven Mestdagh wrote: > > > here is an update of fwbuilder. please test/comment. > > > > There is a crash when working with object groups, still > > investigating... >

Re: UPDATE: security/fwbuilder

2009-04-07 Thread Vadim Zhukov
On 5 April 2009 г. 19:41:22 Vadim Zhukov wrote: > On 5 April 2009 г. 18:25:45 Steven Mestdagh wrote: > > here is an update of fwbuilder. please test/comment. > > There is a crash when working with object groups, still > investigating... > > BTW: Are there any Konqueror users which expirence any pro

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/07 11:55, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:24:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > from texmf/Makefile: > > > > # Also annoyingly loads of .orig files confuse update-patches > > > > to help here, you can either use PATCHORIG, see bsd.port.mk(5), or add > >

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:14:22PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:07:48PM +0100, Stefan Sperling said that > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > With regards to @pkgpath for teTeX, I don't mind, but some people may be > > > choosing

diff for x11/openbox

2009-04-07 Thread David Coppa
Hi, This diff adds a runtime dependency on devel/py-xdg, because /usr/local/lib/openbox/xdg-autostart requires it. Since openbox already depends on python, this isn't an heavy addition. I've also remaked the Makefile using the new spacing convention. cheers, David Index: Makefile ==

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:07:48PM +0100, Stefan Sperling said that > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > > With regards to @pkgpath for teTeX, I don't mind, but some people may be > > choosing to run teTeX instead of TeX Live. Do what you think is right :) > > I th

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > With regards to @pkgpath for teTeX, I don't mind, but some people may be > choosing to run teTeX instead of TeX Live. Do what you think is right :) I thought teTeX was unmaintained? Stefan

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:24:53AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > from texmf/Makefile: > > # Also annoyingly loads of .orig files confuse update-patches > > to help here, you can either use PATCHORIG, see bsd.port.mk(5), or add > this to a suitable target: > > find . -name '*.orig'

Re: new gq version

2009-04-07 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 06.04.2009 um 22:48 schrieb Landry Breuil: On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:42:21AM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 11:41:40PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 12:14:47PM +0200, Mischa Diehm wrote: Hi, mbalmer@ pointed out there might be a pa

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
from texmf/Makefile: # Also annoyingly loads of .orig files confuse update-patches to help here, you can either use PATCHORIG, see bsd.port.mk(5), or add this to a suitable target: find . -name '*.orig' -print0 | xargs -0 rm

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/07 09:19, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Edd Barrett wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > a) Fix binaries missed due to a Makefile ignoring systrace denying junk > > being dumped on the filsystem in the wrong place. > > > > b) Separate script (tl-link-config) to decide which config

Re: TeX Live: 2 bug fixes

2009-04-07 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > a) Fix binaries missed due to a Makefile ignoring systrace denying junk > being dumped on the filsystem in the wrong place. > > b) Separate script (tl-link-config) to decide which config to symlink. > Fixes the situation where -base gets bumped an