lightty 1.4.21 pre-release

For anyone wanting to try out the lightty 1.4.21 pre-release here is a quick update. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/anoncvs/cvs/ports/www/lighttpd/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff -u -p -r1.54 Makefile --- Makefile23

Re: Transmission 1.50 Beta 2

On Wednesday 21 January 2009 11:30:50 Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Robert wrote: > > IPv6 support only tested locally, seemed fine. > > What do you mean by "tested locally"? > > Unless I'm doing something wrong, web/remote access over v6 isn't > possible; transmission doesn't even listen for it o

UPDATE: Transmission 1.50

An update to the Transmission 1.50 release. A bunch of bug fixes and various small improvements as well as initial IPv6 support. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/transmission/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -p

Re: Java and audio? Attempt at running sip-communicator

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:44:36PM +0100, viq wrote: > I tried running a java app that uses audio - > http://sip-communicator.org/ - and it couldn't find any audio devices. > Thus my question - is java aware of our audio system? Is it java's fault > that this doesn't seem to work, or rather the app

UPD: devel/p5-Moose (again)

0.69 Thu, February 12, 2009 * Moose - Make some keyword errors use throw_error instead of croak since Moose::Exporter wraps keywords now (Sartak) * Moose::Cookbook::* - Revised every recipe for style and clarity. Also moved some documentation out of cookbook re

UPD: devel/p5-Moose (again)

0.69 Thu, February 12, 2009 * Moose - Make some keyword errors use throw_error instead of croak since Moose::Exporter wraps keywords now (Sartak) * Moose::Cookbook::* - Revised every recipe for style and clarity. Also moved some documentation out of cookbook recipes

Re: request "traffic" into ports

On 2009/02/13 13:28, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53:40AM +0700, Agung T. Apriyanto wrote: > > dear list, > > > > i would like to request this application "traffic" to be add into > > ports, although it currently no longer active but i found it quite > > usefull because main goa

Re: request "traffic" into ports

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:53:40AM +0700, Agung T. Apriyanto wrote: > dear list, > > i would like to request this application "traffic" to be add into > ports, although it currently no longer active but i found it quite > usefull because main goal of this program to monitor/count bandwidth > usage

request "traffic" into ports

dear list, i would like to request this application "traffic" to be add into ports, although it currently no longer active but i found it quite usefull because main goal of this program to monitor/count bandwidth usage by IP. if no one interested, perhaps they would like to point me which from "tr

Re: md5?

Hi, On Thu, 12.02.2009 at 21:25:34 +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Should be trivial, but that's not my decision. And really, what's > the point? Unless the MD5 file has a different distribution path, > it offers no security benefit. It's handy to check for inadvertent > transfer corrup

Re: opera gcc295 more stable?

Antoine, On 13-Feb-2009 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Stuart is right. > I said "!mp install". Whoops, I totally missed that. -- Aaron W. Hsu | "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastia

Re: opera gcc295 more stable?

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/02/13 10:29, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > > Hey Antoine, > > > > Thanks a bunch for your work... > > > > On 11-Feb-2009 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > It seems the gcc295 version of opera is much more stable for me after > > > several testings on a

Re: opera gcc295 more stable?

On 2009/02/13 10:29, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > Hey Antoine, > > Thanks a bunch for your work... > > On 11-Feb-2009 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > It seems the gcc295 version of opera is much more stable for me after > > several testings on a default !mp install (no async dns tweaks needed). > > I have

Re: opera gcc295 more stable?

Hey Antoine, Thanks a bunch for your work... On 11-Feb-2009 Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > It seems the gcc295 version of opera is much more stable for me after > several testings on a default !mp install (no async dns tweaks needed). I have tried both with and without the async dns tweaks as well a

Re: NEW: lang/petite-chez

Hey Stuart, Thanks for your analysis, On 11-Feb-2009 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/02/11 15:29, Will Maier wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:47:15PM -0500, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: >> > Attached is a port for Petite Chez Scheme, a high-speed threaded Scheme >> > interpreter. This is a rock-soli

Re: FIX: misc/magicpoint

Giovanni Bechis wrote: Magicpoint segfaults when the presentation is using unicode chars and ttf fonts (tested with x11/msttcorefonts), this diff fixes that. To reproduce the problem: $ sudo pkg_add magicpoint msttcorefonts $ echo "tfdir \"/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/mscorefonts\"" >>~/.mgprc $ mgp

Re: Missing symbols

On 2009/02/12 23:46, Stuart Cassoff wrote: > These libs do not have debugging symbols, seemingly violating porting > checklist item number twenty. > > libwraster.so.5.0 > libungif.so.5.4 > libpng.so.8.0 > libtiff.so.38.2 > libjpeg.so.62.0 > This checklist item just talks about stripping, buildin

[new] www/varnish version 2.0.3

Couldn't sleep... Varnish 2.0.3 - high-performance HTTP accelerator I've rolled this up to the latest release. Builds on i386 -current and tested on sparc64 -current. I might take maintainer after all depending on my employer using it. Should have an answer in the next few business days. I wo

Re: opera gcc295 more stable?

I tried opera for the first time, loaded youtube but then it just froze the app. I was using with opera-flashplugin-7.0 and also didn't do any changes in opera's configuration. This is on a normal bsd. I will do some more tests this weekend on other machines. rodolfo On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:30