On Thursday 04 December 2008 18:16:32 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:04PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > at least we don't break the current koffice3, for now.
> >
> > Now I really think we should go down the road you have proposed earlier:
> > Making a 1.1.x/ dir for main
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:04PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > at least we don't break the current koffice3, for now.
> Now I really think we should go down the road you have proposed earlier:
> Making a 1.1.x/ dir for mainting compatibility with koffice 1.6, and a
> 1.3.x for the latest stable
Dear Devs,
now that the ports tree is unlocked please test my port and commit it if
possible. I'd like to give you any help you need.
--
Gabri Mate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
postfixadmin.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Dear Sirs,
My name is Michael Woods, I'm an Advertising Manager of Perfect Money
payment system and I offer you to install Perfect Money API Merchant to
accept payments via Perfect Money. If your service and Perfect Money become
partners you will have a lot of advantages:
- You will obta
On 2008/12/04 15:09, Frank Denis wrote:
> How to do an arch-dependant PLIST?
see pkg_create, VARIABLE SUBSTITUTION AND FRAGMENT INCLUSION
Look at the existing port; ocaml.port.mk sets MODOCAML_NATIVE=yes if
ocamlopt has a backend for that port.
Drop me a copy of the port if you update it and I'll test it. I'm
brushing off my OpenBSD ports at the moment. Can anyone give me a
login on a sparc64 -current box? Unfortunately my
Hello Anil,
How to do an arch-dependant PLIST?
Le Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 10:35:54AM +, Anil Madhavapeddy ecrivait :
> The sparc64 port of OCaml doesnt have a native code compiler, so the
> PLISTs are probably wrong in the update. Anything with .opt wont exist
> there.
>
> -anil
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:27:50PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:44:07PM +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I don't think adding empty directories to PLISTs warrants a
> > bump for the bindings packages though, so I didn't bump them.
>
> You're wrong.
>
> You don't have to
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:44:07PM +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I don't think adding empty directories to PLISTs warrants a
> bump for the bindings packages though, so I didn't bump them.
You're wrong.
You don't have to think.
PLIST change -> bump.
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Stefan Sperling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed diff below.
Works sparc64.
--
Best Regards
Edd
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
The sparc64 port of OCaml doesnt have a native code compiler, so the
PLISTs are probably wrong in the update. Anything with .opt wont
exist there.
-anil
On 26 Nov 2008, at 00:27, Alex Popov wrote:
On 11/25/2008 10:42, Frank Denis wrote:
Here's an update of OCaml from version 3.09.3 to
On 2008/12/03 17:27, Tim Howe wrote:
>
> I'm pretty interested in an update to this port too. I seem to recall
> it not being too hard to compile, but I think I had to make a couple of minor
> changes to the configure script (I reported upstream). Most of the stuff in
> the port Makefiles
12 matches
Mail list logo
