Re: usr/ports as a symlink?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:26:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: >> I've had /usr/ports as a symlink for years too. I started noticing >> the 0 byte packages fairly recently. figured it was transient. >> >> if it's now true tha

Re: usr/ports as a symlink?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:26:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: >> I've had /usr/ports as a symlink for years too. I started noticing >> the 0 byte packages fairly recently. figured it was transient. >> >> if it's now true tha

Re: usr/ports as a symlink?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:52:23PM -0500, Jason Beaudoin wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 10:46:19PM -0500, Jason Beaudoin wrote: >> >> On Mon, D

Re: update: -tools and -contrib subpackages for subversion-1.5.4

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Steven Mestdagh wrote: > > > The stuff in -contrib may have different licenses and copyright holders > > > than Subversion proper. > > > > Have you checked whether those licenses allow us t

Re: NEW: emulators/sdlmess

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 04:47:26PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 05:20:58PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote: > > Hi, > > Following the sdlmame port, here is one of sdlmess 0.126 (0.127 isn't > > out yet). > > > > Same instructions for testing, except for roms: > > provided that

Re: NEW: emulators/sdlmame

Here is an update to sdlmame 0.128. Some testing would still be appreciated :) Pierre On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 02:42:11PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote: > > Hi, > > emulators/xmame has not been active upstream for 2 years. > > It has be

Re: usr/ports as a symlink?

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:26:26AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote: > I've had /usr/ports as a symlink for years too. I started noticing > the 0 byte packages fairly recently. figured it was transient. > > if it's now true that using a symlink for PORTSDIR is a problem, > it needs to be documented som

UPDATE: print/foo2zjs

Update to latest version of this printer driver. Some bug fixed and many drivers added. Full changelog available at http://foo2zjs.rkkda.com/ChangeLog Port tested @amd64 with Hp2600n laser color printer. Cheers Giovanni Index: Makefile ===