On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rajneesh N. Shetty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine
Chrome only works on Windows. Source code builds some framework stuff
on some other platforms, but nothing useful yet.
Give it a few months.
tel : +61431 823 603
Peter,
I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine;value returned=not
32bit app.find that hard to believe, any ideas?Rajneesh
'Worry looks around, sorry looks back, faith looks up'.
--- On Wed, 3/9/08, Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Peter Hessl
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:56:55PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> indeed. I think this is what was breaking update-patches before
> too, I fixed it in the tarball I sent but forgot to comment on it.
>
> there is actually a related problem which happens sometimes with
> ports with subpackages: if
Hello All,
I haven't seemed to hear anything back, so I wanted to send out another
message just in case something was missed. I submitted a new port
for the NN newsreader, but I have not received any feedback or indications
of problems that need fixing. Could someone please provide either
feed
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:20:38PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> * Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> >
> > > The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also
> > > clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an
>
On 2008/09/05 15:20, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > COMMENT = Rockbox Utility
> >
> > this could be a bit more descriptive, maybe something like
> > "tool to install Rockbox firmware on portable music players"
> >
> Too lo
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > COMMENT = Rockbox Utility
>
> this could be a bit more descriptive, maybe something like
> "tool to install Rockbox firmware on portable music players"
>
Too long
install rockbox firmware on ipod
(does it apply t
* Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> > The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also
> > clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an
> > oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:03:19PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Their codebase does not even work on 64-bit systems yet! IMO this is
> beyond ridiculous.
On the other hand, they have a lot of manpower, so wait and see...
I predict that, in 3 months time, it will be much better.
On 2008/09/04 23:23, Brian wrote:
> I fixed the package installation process and dependencies. This port will
> now install properly. Please test.
>
> If you are installing on an iPod other than a nano, please send me a
> disklabel readout of the iPod.
>
> Again, check out: http://www.rockb
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also
> clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an
> oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare MIT one.
> This opens the question
The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it
also clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was
an oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare
MIT one.
This opens the question of moving this into Xenocara rather than keeping
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Here's an update to git-1.6.0. Please test and comment.
> Thanks!
works fine on i386 and sparc64 with my usage pattern (clone diff push
pull commit etc..). git svn is okay too, i only have to adapt to the new
'git svn' synta
Hey!
Here's an update to git-1.6.0. Please test and comment.
Thanks!
Regards,
Bernd
Makefile |4
distinfo | 30 -
patches/patch-Makefile| 40 +-
patches/patch-git-gui_git-gui_sh
14 matches
Mail list logo