Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Rajneesh N. Shetty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine Chrome only works on Windows. Source code builds some framework stuff on some other platforms, but nothing useful yet. Give it a few months.

Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Rajneesh N. Shetty
tel : +61431 823 603 Peter, I coud'nt install Google's Chrome browser on my machine;value returned=not 32bit app.find that hard to believe, any ideas?Rajneesh 'Worry looks around, sorry looks back, faith looks up'. --- On Wed, 3/9/08, Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Peter Hessl

Re: [NEW]: rbutil - Rockbox Utility *fixed*

2008-09-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:56:55PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > indeed. I think this is what was breaking update-patches before > too, I fixed it in the tarball I sent but forgot to comment on it. > > there is actually a related problem which happens sometimes with > ports with subpackages: if

Status? news/nn

2008-09-05 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
Hello All, I haven't seemed to hear anything back, so I wanted to send out another message just in case something was missed. I submitted a new port for the NN newsreader, but I have not received any feedback or indications of problems that need fixing. Could someone please provide either feed

Re: UPDATE: xcompmgr 1.1.4

2008-09-05 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:20:38PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: > * Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > > > > The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also > > > clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an >

Re: [NEW]: rbutil - Rockbox Utility *fixed*

2008-09-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/09/05 15:20, Marc Espie wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > COMMENT = Rockbox Utility > > > > this could be a bit more descriptive, maybe something like > > "tool to install Rockbox firmware on portable music players" > > > Too lo

Re: [NEW]: rbutil - Rockbox Utility *fixed*

2008-09-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > COMMENT = Rockbox Utility > > this could be a bit more descriptive, maybe something like > "tool to install Rockbox firmware on portable music players" > Too long install rockbox firmware on ipod (does it apply t

Re: UPDATE: xcompmgr 1.1.4

2008-09-05 Thread Marc Balmer
* Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > > > The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also > > clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an > > oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare

Re: chromium comes to town

2008-09-05 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:03:19PM -0400, Brad wrote: > Their codebase does not even work on 64-bit systems yet! IMO this is > beyond ridiculous. On the other hand, they have a lot of manpower, so wait and see... I predict that, in 3 months time, it will be much better.

Re: [NEW]: rbutil - Rockbox Utility *fixed*

2008-09-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/09/04 23:23, Brian wrote: > I fixed the package installation process and dependencies. This port will > now install properly. Please test. > > If you are installing on an iPod other than a nano, please send me a > disklabel readout of the iPod. > > Again, check out: http://www.rockb

Re: UPDATE: xcompmgr 1.1.4

2008-09-05 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also > clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an > oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare MIT one. > This opens the question

UPDATE: xcompmgr 1.1.4

2008-09-05 Thread Matthieu Herrb
The attached patch update xcompmgr to 1.1.4. Apart from bug fixes, it also clarifies the licence. The GPL in COPYING in the 1.1.1 version was an oversight and has been removed upstream. So the license is now a bare MIT one. This opens the question of moving this into Xenocara rather than keeping

Re: UPDATE: git-1.6.0

2008-09-05 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Bernd Ahlers wrote: > Hey! > > Here's an update to git-1.6.0. Please test and comment. > Thanks! works fine on i386 and sparc64 with my usage pattern (clone diff push pull commit etc..). git svn is okay too, i only have to adapt to the new 'git svn' synta

UPDATE: git-1.6.0

2008-09-05 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Hey! Here's an update to git-1.6.0. Please test and comment. Thanks! Regards, Bernd Makefile |4 distinfo | 30 - patches/patch-Makefile| 40 +- patches/patch-git-gui_git-gui_sh