On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:28:51PM -0400, James Turner wrote:
> Attached are two diffs that brings dwm to 5.0 and dmenu to 3.7, each
> released today.
Opps, for got to add, tested on amd64
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Attached are two diffs that brings dwm to 5.0 and dmenu to 3.7, each
released today.
--
James Turner
BSD Group Consulting
http://www.bsdgroup.org
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.8
dif
Will Maier wrote on Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:50:11AM -0500:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:27:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
>> * Hopefully, Python 2.3 can be dropped in the near future.
>
> If by 'dropped' you mean 'removed from the tree', I imagine this
> will happen at some point (though it does
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> If the purpose of a patch is obvious, there's no reason to add a
> comment. But sometimes it isn't obvious, or you're patching stuff
> you want to send to (and explain to) upstream later. For an example
> of missing comments, please look at the ghostscr
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:15:09PM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
> We don't usually include comments in the patch files.
To second Bernd's response:
If the purpose of a patch is obvious, there's no reason to add a
comment. But sometimes it isn't obvious, or you're patching stuff
you want to send to (a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:26:39PM +0300, Martynas Venckus wrote:
> Hey,
>
> (Yes, this one does have scrolling bar problem fixed.)
>
> Known issues:
> - images rendered incorrectly on nvidia cards with 24 bits, due to
> incompatibilities between nvidia drivers and x; workaround:
> DefaultDepth
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Christophe Da Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to compile devel/bzr from the ports on my OpenBSD 4.3 GENERIC#698
> i386, but I get this:
>
> +++ Tue Jun 17 08:21:22 CEST 2008
> ===> Cleaning for bzr-1.3
> ===> Checking files for bzr-1.3
> `/usr/ports/distfi
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Christophe Da Silva wrote:
> I try to compile devel/bzr from the ports on my OpenBSD 4.3
> GENERIC#698 i386, but I get this:
You need a more recent system.
> +++ Tue Jun 17 08:21:22 CEST 2008
> ===> Cleaning for bzr-1.3
> ===> Checking files for bzr-1.3
On 2008/06/18 22:16, Christophe Da Silva wrote:
>
> I try to compile devel/bzr from the ports on my OpenBSD 4.3 GENERIC#698
> i386, but I get this:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
Hi,
I try to compile devel/bzr from the ports on my OpenBSD 4.3 GENERIC#698
i386, but I get this:
+++ Tue Jun 17 08:21:22 CEST 2008
===> Cleaning for bzr-1.3
===> Checking files for bzr-1.3
`/usr/ports/distfiles/bzr-1.3.tar.gz' is up to date.
>> (SHA256) bzr-1.3.tar.gz: OK
===> bzr-1.3 depe
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Christian Weisgerber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the suggested setting, there is nothing there at all. No hint
> that you're missing content because of a missing plugin. My initial
> impression is that this is confusing.
you're missing content that you wou
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:26:39 +0300 (EEST), Martynas Venckus wrote:
> ...What i need is to know on which archs does this work,
> and on which doesn't.
Works for me on i386, using the revised nspr patch.
Quoting Stuart Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[..]
> > > > make port-lib-depends-check complains :
> > > > Extra: X11.11
> > > > Extra: Xext.10
> > > > Extra: usbhid.3
> > > >
> > > > Maybe a local problem, my system is from last week pre-hackathon
> > > > snapshot, and i s
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:01:28PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Marc Espie:
>
> > >> Full build log (6 MB !) available at
> > >> http://viq.ath.cx/obsd/qt4-4.3.5.log
> >
> > Iconv fuckup. Naddy ?
>
> Looks like iconv() ended up with the old "const" prototype on that
> system. That happe
Marc Espie:
> >> Full build log (6 MB !) available at
> >> http://viq.ath.cx/obsd/qt4-4.3.5.log
>
> Iconv fuckup. Naddy ?
Looks like iconv() ended up with the old "const" prototype on that
system. That happens if you build libiconv with an older one still
installed... I wanted to fix that, but
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Update to 0.3. patches/patch-tty_c should be removed.
>
> Tested on i386, sparc64.
>
> Change log is at:
>
> http://sf.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=607660&group_id=200378
Looks good on i386.
Any other oks?
--
o
This works on amd64 as well. You have my blessing to get it in, I've
been using it for weeks. :)
Brandon
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Nicholas Marriott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Update to 0.3. patches/patch-tty_c should be removed.
>
> Tested on i386, sparc64.
>
> Change log is at:
>
> h
Update to 0.3. patches/patch-tty_c should be removed.
Tested on i386, sparc64.
Change log is at:
http://sf.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=607660&group_id=200378
-- Nicholas
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/misc/tmux
--On June 16, 2008 1:20:28 PM +0200 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
according to dlg who also spent some time on this issue, it's some
syscall going crazy. if you have the time to dig into this, please don't
hesitate and debug devel/vte (where gnome-pty-helper comes from),
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:17:55PM +0200, Christian Rueger wrote:
> viq wrote:
>> kern.version=OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #1: Tue Jun 17 11:05:25 CEST
>> 2008
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
>>
> [...]
>>
>> Full build log (6 MB !) available at
>> http://viq.ath.c
viq wrote:
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #1: Tue Jun 17 11:05:25 CEST
2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
[...]
Full build log (6 MB !) available at
http://viq.ath.cx/obsd/qt4-4.3.5.log
same on amd64
OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #27: Mon Jun 16
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:27:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> sorry to chime in late, but I've only come to see this thread
> after updating the port, which was at 0.14, to 1.5. Or at least, I
> think so...
The port is at 1.3 in -current.
> Anyway, please grab my attempt here:
>
> http://www.o
Working for me on i386.
Brandon
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Simon Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:56:53AM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>> more micropatches, includes some format string fixes.
>
> Works for me on amd64.
> --
> simon
>
>
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.3-current (GENERIC) #1: Tue Jun 17 11:05:25 CEST
2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
x11/qt4 fails to package with following error:
===> Building package for qt4-4.3.5
Create /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/qt4-4.3.5.tgz
Error in package:
/home/bu
Hi,
sorry to chime in late, but I've only come to see this thread after
updating the port, which was at 0.14, to 1.5. Or at least, I think
so...
Anyway, please grab my attempt here:
http://www.oeko.net/download/sw/bsd/bzr.tar.gz
and send me feedback.
Some notes:
* The port was prepared on a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:56:53AM -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> more micropatches, includes some format string fixes.
Works for me on amd64.
--
simon
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008/06/16 01:34, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Attached is a patch for updating cln to the latest version. There were
> > some fixes in the main tree for sparc64, if anyone cares to test this on
> > that arch please do so and remember
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:23:11PM -0700, Unix Fan wrote:
>Gosh you people are stupid!
>http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/4868/firefoxmissingpluginbk2.jpg
Not stupid. Not used to that shit any more after months or even years of
NoScript usage.
>[...]
Kind regards,
Hannah.
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:40:05AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>You have to do it manually. There is no point whatsoever in having that
>crap slow my machine down. And with todays internets just about every
>site is excited about informing that I need to install flash.
>I can't believe th
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:09:45PM +0200, Gallon Sylvestre wrote:
> Hi ports,
>
> nasm-2.03 was updated this morning :
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.asm.x86/browse_thread/thread/a037fbf88262c049/f7e757e928dd3c0e?show_docid=f7e757e928dd3c0e
>
> You can find the diff for nasm-2.03.0
It works well @i386, PLIST updated and PKGNAME removed.
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/rdesktop/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 Makefile
--- Makefile15 Sep 2007 20:04:24 -
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2008/06/18 10:14, Thomas Delaet wrote:
> > Update.
> >
> > my PLIST included BASE_PKGPATH. Since none of the ports use this (except
> for
> > two files in the zope port, I guess this is a mistake?), I exclu
On 2008/06/18 10:14, Thomas Delaet wrote:
> Update.
>
> my PLIST included BASE_PKGPATH. Since none of the ports use this (except for
> two files in the zope port, I guess this is a mistake?), I excluded this
> variable in the PLIST.
>
> Can someone explain why make plist generates PLIST files wit
Make one more +1
Update.
my PLIST included BASE_PKGPATH. Since none of the ports use this (except for
two files in the zope port, I guess this is a mistake?), I excluded this
variable in the PLIST.
Can someone explain why make plist generates PLIST files with this variable?
Kind Regards
Thomas
On Sat, May 31,
Hi,
Paul de Weerd schrieb:
> I think (some) people believe Marco's suggestions disables plugins. It
> doesn't. It disables the "Install $PLUGIN to watch this content" thing
> that is supposed to be helpful (and is, on Windows or Mac OSX, where
> you can actually click on the thing and get the prop
36 matches
Mail list logo
