Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:01:10PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Do you have an account? >>> >> >> @openbsd.org? No, I don't. >> >> >>> Has anyone agreed to officially bring back the stable tree? >>> >> >> One developer was interested in pursuing it, but he i

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Ian McWilliam
Uwe Dippel wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have an account? @openbsd.org? No, I don't. Has anyone agreed to officially bring back the stable tree? One developer was interested in pursuing it, but he is very busy with other things. My own 2 sen: As much as your work

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Uwe Dippel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have an account? @openbsd.org? No, I don't. Has anyone agreed to officially bring back the stable tree? One developer was interested in pursuing it, but he is very busy with other things. My own 2 sen: As much as your work is great, IMHHO t

Problems with webalizer - anyone?

2008-05-30 Thread Uwe Dippel
Since the upgrade 4.2->4.3 I have some non-reproducible fault of the 'new' webalizer. maybe one out of twenty runs it does not finish, and takes some resources, until I kill its running ~15 child processes manually. It is started from daily.local here, and on those days I don't get the mail, bec

Re: NEW: misc/tmux

2008-05-30 Thread Brynet
Mike Erdely wrote: NO_REGRESS = Yes And, it's missing MAINTAINER. -ME On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:27:35PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: Window splitting is on the todo list but it won't be any time soon. Port looks good to me aside from a couple of things. You can do: FAKE_FLAGS= PREFIX

Re: Problem with qt3 (or is it an X problem)

2008-05-30 Thread Ulrich Kahl
Am Thu, 29 May 2008 08:19:17 -0400 schrieb "Stephan Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm not sure that ports is the right place for this as I don't know > if this is really an X problem? Basically I'd like to know if others > have compiled qt3 after the recent X changes, ie, did I screw up > or is

UPDATE: editors/texmaker

2008-05-30 Thread Thomas Delaet
Update to 1.7.1. Tested on i386. -- Thomas texmaker.patch Description: Binary data

Re: NEW: misc/tmux

2008-05-30 Thread Mike Erdely
NO_REGRESS = Yes And, it's missing MAINTAINER. -ME On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:27:35PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Window splitting is on the todo list but it won't be any time soon. > > Port looks good to me aside from a couple of things. You can do: > > FAKE_FLAGS= PREFIX=${PREFIX} >

Re: NEW: misc/tmux

2008-05-30 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Window splitting is on the todo list but it won't be any time soon. Port looks good to me aside from a couple of things. You can do: FAKE_FLAGS= PREFIX=${PREFIX} And lose the Makefile patch. Also, PKGNAME doesn't need to be defined if it is the same as DISTNAME. Port works for me on i386.

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.3-stable/ > http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.2-stable/ > http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/4.1-stable/ > > Guess people care now that 4.3 was released? I had 4.3 stuff up since > the tree was tagged. So lets wor

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread marius
Samba and rsync (and many other 4.{1,2,3} -stable ports) are available at http://openbsd.rutgers.edu/ . I'm not running -stable anywhere (moved all the servers to -current), but will install it somewhere next week and see what I can do to help. //mts On 5/30/08, viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Ian McWilliam
Edd Barrett wrote: OK, Seeing as there has been a lot of whining on ports@ regarding the lack of stable packages for OpenBSD-stable, I will be the first to set the ball rolling. http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett/obsd-stable/ Here you find diffs and i386 packages of thunderbird and firefo

UPDATE: x11/numlockx

2008-05-30 Thread Thomas Delaet
Update to 1.1. Tested on i386. -- Thomas numlockx.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread viq
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:51:05AM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > OK, > > Seeing as there has been a lot of whining on ports@ regarding the lack > of stable packages for OpenBSD-stable, I will be the first to set the > ball rolling. > > http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett/obsd-stable/ > > Here

Stable ports and packages

2008-05-30 Thread Edd Barrett
OK, Seeing as there has been a lot of whining on ports@ regarding the lack of stable packages for OpenBSD-stable, I will be the first to set the ball rolling. http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett/obsd-stable/ Here you find diffs and i386 packages of thunderbird and firefox for OpenBSD 4.2 and

Re: NEW: misc/tmux

2008-05-30 Thread Guillaume Sellier
Brynet wrote: No problem, thanks for testing.. attaching a fixed copy. tested on amd64, working well. Do you know if horizontal splitting feature is planned (as in screen-cvs) ? -- Guillaume