Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:49:16PM -0800, Unix Fan wrote: >This really is stupid, a majority of the users of OpenBSD purchased 4.2 CD's.. >are likely expecting it would be a supported release. > >-CURRENT is a rapidly moving target, and I don't feel like updating my kernel >a billion times a mont

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

> based on the way you've chosen to address the issue you probably have no > clue about what additional actual security is supplied by going 2.0.0.9 > -> 2.0.0.10. if this is so freaking important, why not post some code > for the killer exploit that you can run against firefox 2.0.0.9? For you

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

On Thu, 28 Nov 2007, Unix Fan wrote: a secure OS is nothing without secure software... I wouldn't say nothing! It is definitely a good thing that the base system is secure. (For example, it's usually possible to use only the base system when doing system maintenance, which limits the risk of u

Re: UPDATE: audio/mpg123

need remove /usr/ports/audio/mpg123/patches directory. builded on i386 ok -- No self-respecting fish would want to be wrapped in that kind of paper. -- Mike Royko on the Chicago Sun-Times after it was taken over by Rupert Murdoch

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

On 28 Nov 2007 15:49:16 -0800, Unix Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ports should only be updated for the "latest" release, not -CURRENT... a > secure OS is nothing without secure software... I strongly disagree. Introducing new features into a release willy nilly is a bad way to go about thing

Re: UPDATE: audio/mpg123

IBM-ThinkPad-570[/usr/ports/audio]-root->patch -d mpg123 < /data/patch/mpg123.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |Index: Makefile |=== |RCS file: /cvs/ports/aud

Re: UPDATE: audio/mpg123

can't builded in openbsd snapshots i386 IBM-ThinkPad-570[/usr/ports/audio/mpg123]-root->make install clean ===> Checking files for mpg123-0.68 `/usr/ports/distfiles/mpg123-0.68.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) mpg123-0.68.tar.gz: OK ===> Verifying specs: c m c m ===> found c.42.0 m.2.3 ===>

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This really is stupid, a majority of the users of OpenBSD > purchased 4.2 CD's.. are likely expecting it would be a supported > release. > > -CURRENT is a rapidly moving target, and I don't feel like > updating my kernel a billion times a month... just to get the > late

Re: [UPDATE] net/snort 2.8.0

On Nov 28, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Markus Lude wrote: Hello, here is an update to snort 2.8.0. Please test/comment/commit/... Based on changes for 2.7.0.1 by Jason Dixon. Some added patches fix bus errors on sparc64 noticed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Crashes on my alpha. I've sent you a new kdump offlis

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

This really is stupid, a majority of the users of OpenBSD purchased 4.2 CD's.. are likely expecting it would be a supported release. -CURRENT is a rapidly moving target, and I don't feel like updating my kernel a billion times a month... just to get the latest version of firefox! Ports shou

E-Ticketing your Events

To Whom It May Concern, This is Dan Gargano - Owner/CEO of www.ticketmuncher.com. I just wanted to give you, promoters, and event planners a heads up that we are now offering a free consulting service to help you sell tickets to your events. Basically, as a company with over 3,000 clients (all

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:57:01PM -0800, Unix Fan wrote: > I've been using OpenBSD 4.2 (-STABLE) on my main workstations for a > few months now, but I'm confused with something... > > OpenBSD developers recommend that users use binary packages instead of > ports, but only users of the bleeding ed

[UPDATE] net/snort 2.8.0

Hello, here is an update to snort 2.8.0. Please test/comment/commit/... Based on changes for 2.7.0.1 by Jason Dixon. Some added patches fix bus errors on sparc64 noticed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] If noone other wants, I would take maintainership (not included in diff). Regards, Markus Index: Makefil

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:57:01PM -0800, Unix Fan wrote: > I've been using OpenBSD 4.2 (-STABLE) on my main workstations for a few > months now, but I'm confused with something... > > OpenBSD developers recommend that users use binary packages instead of ports, > but only users of the bleeding

Re: good console jabber client?

On Nov 28, 2007 10:20 PM, Simon Bertrang > ... an update with feedback from Simon Kuhnle and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Just tested on amd64, i386 and macppc without problems. > > It coredumps for Simon Kuhnle on /reconnect but doesn't for me. Can > someone else try it too? > > Regards, > Simon > it seg

Firefox 2.0.0.10? For OpenBSD 4.2-CURRENT only??

I've been using OpenBSD 4.2 (-STABLE) on my main workstations for a few months now, but I'm confused with something... OpenBSD developers recommend that users use binary packages instead of ports, but only users of the bleeding edge -CURRENT codebase get access to the latest releases of Firefox

Re: UPDATE: graphics/gimp

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:09:35PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Could you (or anyone else) retry with this one? It's just updated > to 2.4.2 (bugfix release). Got some feedback. Positive tests from Rodolfo Gouveia for i386 and powerpc. simon@ still has the reported weirdness (green tool cursor

Re: Samba 3.0.27a for OpenBSD 4.2-stable

Here's my CVS diff to make 3.0.27a: cvs server: Diffing . Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/samba/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.79 diff -u -r1.79 Makefile --- Makefile2007/02/06 07:01:13 1.79 +++ Makefile200

Re: good console jabber client?

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:29:55PM +0100, Simon Bertrang wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:55:38PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pierre-Yves Ritschard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Sergey Prysiazhnyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any Subj in ports tree? Like centericq, etc? Thank you

Re: Samba 3.0.27a for OpenBSD 4.2-stable

On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 09:35 +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote: > Attached is a port of Samba 3.0.27a for people using 4.2-stable. > > Samba 3.0.27 is a security release to address CVE-2007-4572 > and CVE-2007-5398 >

[PATCH] net/tinyfugue

Hello, on sparc64 the time displayed in the status line is always 01:00. When building the port I get the warning: util.c: In function `tftime': util.c:1136: warning: passing arg 1 of `localtime' from incompatible pointer type In my ~/.tfrc I have: /set status_int_clock=ftime("%H:%M", time())

UPDATE: audio/mpg123

Mpg123 updated to latest version, files/* and patches/* are no more needed to build, support to arch without fpu (arm) has been added but should be tested. Tested @i386 Giovanni Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/audio/mpg123/Ma

UPDATE: devel/py-parsing

This trivial update bumps py-parsing to 1.4.8, the latest stable release (changes here[0]). The patch also fixes the homepage. Tested on -current/i386. Patch below my sig and available via HTTP: http://www.lfod.us/files/ports/py-parsing-1.4.8.diff Thanks! diffstat: 3 files changed, 13 i

[SECURITY UPDATE] www/liferea 1.4.6 -> 1.4.8

Update is trivial, but the changelog less so. Works for me on i386. 2007-11-22 Lars Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Version 1.4.8 (Stable) * Now never loads duplicates when using recursive folder view. This avoids duplicate removal problems when using Mark-All-R

Re: UPDATE: Pidgin 2.3.0

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:46:50AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2007/11/27 10:34, viq wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:08:20AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Brad wrote: > > > > Here is an update to Pidgin 2.3.0. > > > > > > I just applied