> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I just wondered who`s still using PGP except of GnuPG wich is compatible
>> (nd yupp, idea is free now...).
>>
>> So (because the ports hackatron is still n action (?)) I asked myself if
>> some obsulate ports may could get kicked out.
>
> maybe we should get rid of
I have -current installed,
some info :
$ date
Thu Oct 26 00:33:45 BST 2006.
$ uname -a
OpenBSD phoenix.local 4.0 GENERIC#2 i386
$ pkg_info -v gnome-vfs2-2.10.1p0
[...]
Size: 5470791
Signature:
gnome-vfs2-2.10.1p0,ORBit-2.0.0,ORBitCosNaming-2.0.0,bonobo-2.0.0,bonobo-activation.4.0,bz2.10.3,bzip2
hi all
login_ldap 3.4 is available here http://www.yojutsu.org/login_ldap-3.4.tar.gz
at the moment i dont have the time nor hardware to work on a port,
hopefully sometime soon though.
thanks
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just wondered who`s still using PGP except of GnuPG wich is compatible
> (nd yupp, idea is free now...).
>
> So (because the ports hackatron is still n action (?)) I asked myself if
> some obsulate ports may could get kicked out.
maybe we should get rid of some obsu
newer version also includes
* xls2csv, which converts excel files to comma separted value format
* catppt, a utility to extract textual information from powerpoint files.
please test.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textpro
I just wondered who`s still using PGP except of GnuPG wich is compatible
(nd yupp, idea is free now...).
So (because the ports hackatron is still n action (?)) I asked myself if
some obsulate ports may could get kicked out.
kind regards,
Sebastian
--
Don't buy anything from YeongYang.
Their Comp
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
--
viq
On Oct 24, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Would I need to Do anything Special to Apache on OpenBSD to get it to
run XMLRPC (AJAX)?
a quick Google Search shows mod_xmlrpc is written for apache 2, witch
AFAIK OpenBSD 4.0 Does not support.
here is where i found mod_xmlrpc
http://fresh
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
It would be neat if that could get fixed.
Btw: What about other update slike Firefox for 4.0??
Kind regards,
Sebastian
--
Don't buy anything from YeongYang.
Their Computercases are e
* Brad [2006-10-25]:
> I'm fine with the fact that -c only removes configuration files now.
> But another flag has to be added that will ensure that ALL traces of
> the package are deleted when I remove said package.
I concur.
Nikolay
--
"It's all part of my Can't-Do approach to life." Wally
> I do not care how you want to describe the situation. There was functionality
> there that I relied upon and was there intentionally and it has been removed
> with no functional equivalent, that is unacceptable. I'm fine with the fact
> that -c only removes configuration files now. But another fl
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:19:58PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > I do not care how you want to describe the situation. There was
> > functionality
> > there that I relied upon and was there intentionally and it has been removed
> > with no functional equivalent, that is unacceptable. I'm fine with
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:51:04AM +0200, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
> Brad [Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 06:53:40PM -0400] wrote:
> >Whatever the new flag is it should mimic the old behavior of -c and
> >remove everything.
> >
> There is no 'old behavior' of -c. It always said:
>
> -c Delete e
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Alright, I made some cleanups to your gocr port and
- added NO_REGRESS
- added a -gui SUBPACKAGE
- changed pkg/DESCR
Tested under amd64.
Comments anyone?
I just tested it on macppc and it works extremely well too.
Can anyone confirms this works on i
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> screen 4.0.2 is vulnerable and allows for a DoS attack. This updates
> screen to version 4.0.3 which is not vulnerable.
>
> ok?
Works fine for me on i386 (3.9-stable and -current).
To complete things, do your homework. AJAX means nothing and everything.
There are (litterally) tens of AJAX frameworks floating around, in various
states of usability. Some are trivial to port. Other less so.
The first step would be to tell us what you're trying to achieve.
The second step would
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:34:34PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> Would I need to Do anything Special to Apache on OpenBSD to get it to
> run XMLRPC (AJAX)?
>
> a quick Google Search shows mod_xmlrpc is written for apache 2, witch
> AFAIK OpenBSD 4.0 Does not support.
XMLRPC != AJAX. Anyways, th
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Well not exactly new, since I already posted them to the list, but it
seems they got overlooked.
gmpc makes for a nice audio player, it is a gtk+2 mpd client.
I use it on a amd64 workstation. It is light and to the point.
I think it is worth taking a look at it.
I'l
Selon Andreas Bihlmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd really appreciate midnight commander (misc/mc) to be built with
> samba support, so one can access SMB shares as local file systems,
> without mounting them with sharity-light.
> Also direct (directory) SMB -> FTP copy is very nice.
I cleaned the
Well not exactly new, since I already posted them to the list, but it
seems they got overlooked.
gmpc makes for a nice audio player, it is a gtk+2 mpd client.
I use it on a amd64 workstation. It is light and to the point.
I think it is worth taking a look at it.
I'll maintain if needed
> screen 4.0.2 is vulnerable and allows for a DoS attack. This updates
> screen to version 4.0.3 which is not vulnerable.
Works fine here on amd64 && i386.
Screen version 4.00.03 (FAU) 23-Oct-06
--
Martynas Venckus
this diff is for OPENBSD_3_9 to make teTeX fetch it's distfile again.
Index: print/teTeX/texmf/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/teTeX/texmf/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.21 Makefile
--- print/teTeX/texmf/Makef
screen 4.0.2 is vulnerable and allows for a DoS attack. This updates
screen to version 4.0.3 which is not vulnerable.
ok?
Index: misc/screen/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/misc/screen/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -
Brad [Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 06:53:40PM -0400] wrote:
>Whatever the new flag is it should mimic the old behavior of -c and
>remove everything.
>
There is no 'old behavior' of -c. It always said:
-c Delete extra configuration file, mentioned as
@extra file
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 07:07:15PM +0200, steven mestdagh wrote:
>> BUILD_DEPENDS= tcl84::lang/tcl/8.4
>> RUN_DEPENDS=${BUILD_DEPENDS}
>> What do you mean by reverse? BUILD_DEPENDS then RUN_DEPENDS are correct
>> order as in Makefile template.
>
>Some parts of the ports infrast
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 20:46, Bernd Ahlers wrote:
> Any objections?
Nope, ipcalc does evertything i needed from cidr and more.
---
Lars
Selon Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I like this, but I think a home directory of /var/spool/spamassassin
> would make for less clutter in /var
I'm not sure about this. Most of the similar ports seem to use /var for this
kind of data (cyrus-imapd, clamav...).
--
Antoine
27 matches
Mail list logo
