Hi all,
I have created a port of the guifications plugin for gaim. I'm unsure
of how plugins would be handled, but I hope this is ok. It is also my
first attempt at a port, so if anything is wrong I will hopefully
learn.
I have tested under i386 only, it compiles well and works well with gaim.
If
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 04:41:36PM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
>My first port, be gentle.
>This is GNU netcat, which exists since the original nc is no longer
>being maintained, I guess.
>I sort of created this without realizing nc was already in /usr/bin.
>Anyhow, it's GNU, but I have no id
My first port, be gentle.
This is GNU netcat, which exists since the original nc is no longer
being maintained, I guess.
I sort of created this without realizing nc was already in /usr/bin.
Anyhow, it's GNU, but I have no idea how to set PERMIT_* --- the
porting checklist gives no guidance, and
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:22:11 +0200
Alexandre Anriot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's an update for p0f 2.0.6, works fine for me on i386, amd64, macppc and
> > sparc64.
> >
> > http://openbsd-pt.com/ports/p0f-2.0.6.diff
> >
> > Please test and comment.
> > Rui Reis
>
> A few comments, I gue
Thanks for your feedback.
Suggested changes have been made:
- Using version on CPAN: 6.00
- Removed unused lines LIB_DEPENDS, post-patch
- Marking PKG_ARCH= *
- Adjusted DESCR file accordingly
Thanks!
--patrick
--- steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> patrick ~ [2006-04-28, 21:22:
>Maybe, as I asked, 'ping localhost' and 'route show' will shed some
>light on this. (The first, notably, will tell you what localhost
>resolves too; it seems that isn't 127.0.0.1/::1, or your routing table
>is busted, or something is really wrong...)
>
> Joachim
Well everythign is c
> Here's an update for p0f 2.0.6, works fine for me on i386, amd64, macppc and
> sparc64.
>
> http://openbsd-pt.com/ports/p0f-2.0.6.diff
>
> Please test and comment.
> Rui Reis
A few comments, I guess there's no point to use ${V} only once. While
patching mk/OpenBSD, you could disable strip'ing
Here's an update for p0f 2.0.6, works fine for me on i386, amd64, macppc and
sparc64.
http://openbsd-pt.com/ports/p0f-2.0.6.diff
Please test and comment.
Rui Reis
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:23:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Not only are you stupid enough to actually do this, you share this
> > information?
> >
> > I hope you do know that port scanning in some countries is illegal
> > without prior written permission from the owner of the network
> Not only are you stupid enough to actually do this, you share this
> information?
>
> I hope you do know that port scanning in some countries is illegal
> without prior written permission from the owner of the network.
Marco:
1st: get a clue about laws BEFORE you blame me
2nd: Yes the question
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:44:38AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well I seam to run too much scans so I get this error (btw: I just took
> the us-embassy for fun ;)) )
>
> godfather $ sudo nmap -P0 -sV -sS -vvv berlin.usembassy.gov
>
> Starting Nmap 3.95 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2
Not only are you stupid enough to actually do this, you share this
information?
I hope you do know that port scanning in some countries is illegal
without prior written permission from the owner of the network.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I seam to run too much scans so I get this error (b
Joerg Zinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the port is not tricky, just "pure" python.
> please test, comment and maybe commit...
Please test this version instead:
http://atlantilde.com/~alek/ports/directoryassistant.tar.gz
It contains various fixes.
Cheers,
Alek
--
- Co to są litery?
13 matches
Mail list logo
