<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reminder as no committers have replied since I posted this on 03/25.
I actually thought about this when you first contacted me in March
but couldn't make up my mind and it sort of slipped my attention
since...
Still not sure how to deal with this.
Adding another "ma
- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text
mode. -
Dear
Customer
:
We've noticed that you didn't completed the verification request,
Please log in below and complete the verification steps, if you don?t complete
this verification in 3 days, we will have to close
Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The corrected version is at :
> http://deanna.freeshell.org/transmissioncli.1
Great, thanks.
I think it will be easiest to include this in the files/ directory
of the port--or does anyone have a strong opinion in favor of
fetching it as a distfile?
--
On 4/23/06, js <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anybody interested in or working on httperf?
It would be useful to have another option in addition to ab and
http_load -- httperf provides useful features not found in http_load,
including pipelining and replay.
> According to make search key=h
Does anyone use this port any more?
I've had a tough time getting it to work. I'm not sure whether
it's because of misconfiguration by my employer, changes in
Cisco operation, or horrible documentation, and I can't really
work on it much since I get locked out after every few attempts.
Anyway, I
-> SHA1 clean-up (compiler warnings)
-> Important Cache::Cache clean-up (use of File::Temp should avoid some nasty
race conditions in case several people are writing at the same location).
-> quite a few performance improvements and functionality changes in
HTML::Mason.
I specifically did NOT upd
Hello, world.
Is there anybody interested in or working on httperf?
According to make search key=httperf, OpenBSD doesn't have httperf port yet.
(FreeBSD and NetBSD have, though)
I'm thinking that If nobody's doing this, it's not bad to try it myself.
Thanks.
