Tkae ya prefered 40MB "wordlist", a neat TelnetD somewhere and use Hydra
to bruteforce any account.
Then switch to another console and run dsniff ($ dsniff).
Dsniff will coredump after some seconds.
Example (dsniff ran 90-110 seconds):
-
10/08/05 07:07:29 tcp some.where.int.19574
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:19:25PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> what I said was that a system that would not allow a programmer to put
> in their own software was very hostile, and that some method should
> exist to allow a programmer to insert their own work amongst the ports
> software.
there
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I want to be able to put in my own items, and have them be able to:
1) be found by the pkg tools, the *DEPENDS stuff
2) not have files that I've installed be overwritten by installed
files from ports. If I installed a modified gmake, not to have you
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thread if you feel
insulted by good advice.
would you be wiling ot meet me on a irc channel, say, on freenode?
I will be on channel "chuck
Chuck Robey wrote:
I want to be able to put in my own items, and have them be able to:
1) be found by the pkg tools, the *DEPENDS stuff
2) not have files that I've installed be overwritten by installed files
from ports. If I installed a modified gmake, not to have you overwrite it.
I don'
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thread if you feel
insulted by good advice.
would you be wiling ot meet me on a irc channel, say, on freenode?
I will be on channel "chuck
Ray Lai wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
- Installing stuff into the same directories the basic ports install
stuff in is a nice recipe for disaster.
OK, then how about a have "local-1"? I would like, if I install some
shar
Chuck Robey wrote:
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thread if you feel
insulted by good advice.
would you be wiling ot meet me on a irc channel, say, on freenode?
I will be on channel "chuckr" for the next new m
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
You're not a serious developer, you just tinker with stuff...
You know, I'be been as careful as I could be, never to insult any of
you. You know me very little, but you n
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> >- Installing stuff into the same directories the basic ports install
> >stuff in is a nice recipe for disaster.
>
> OK, then how about a have "local-1"? I would like, if I install some
> shared lib in /usr/local-
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Marc Espie wrote:
> >You're not a serious developer, you just tinker with stuff...
> You know, I'be been as careful as I could be, never to insult any of
> you. You know me very little, but you need to support your argument,
> and
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc, I began to reply, because you've begun insulting me here, but
if you'll let it go, I will let it go here. Can you do that? Just
stop reading here.
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time ha
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:13:25PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
Auto-detecting piles of shit without any user control, or with very poor
user control, like GNU configure allows, is a receipe for disaster.
It does NOT help the user, contrarily to what you might think.
Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc, I began to reply, because you've begun insulting me here, but if
you'll let it go, I will let it go here. Can you do that? Just stop
reading here.
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thr
Marc Espie wrote:
Marc, I began to reply, because you've begun insulting me here, but if
you'll let it go, I will let it go here. Can you do that? Just stop
reading here.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
I had put in my own gettext, which installed libintl.so
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:13:25PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Auto-detecting piles of shit without any user control, or with very poor
> user control, like GNU configure allows, is a receipe for disaster.
> It does NOT help the user, contrarily to what you might think.
See also:
http://www.onlamp
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:46:36 +0200
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > i get this error upon installing the package
> > > Couldn't find subject in old manpage
> > > /usr/local/man/man3p/Psh::StrategyBunch.3p
> >
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I had put in my own gettext, which installed libintl.so.7.3. The ports
> installed, on it's own (and I cou;d see how to override this) a
> libintl.so.2.0, but when gmake linked, it added in the 7.3, and gmake
> did 2 rotten things:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I'm going to drop this, if you folks will be kind enough to let me. I
just wish that folks would leave off the kind of response "you're wrong"
and instead try "this is why you're wrong, and this is the right way".
It's a lot more useful.
I am sorry if I've started some
xcompmgr is a sample composite manager for X. Together with the X
composite extension (which needs to be enabled explicitely in xorg.conf)
it helps adding eye-candy (shadows, transparencies, etc) to X
applications. Try for instance fluxbox transparencies with 'xcompmgr -c'.
--
Matthieu Herrb
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
[ a rant ]
You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do). The pkgconfig approach is flawed, it doesn't allow for some
things we would do. The gnu configure approach is worse. It has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
[Let me emphasize that above a little more: un my mind, you're making
a system that's hostile to progammers, unless they are willing to
program for OpenBSD itself.
I assume you never used OpenBSD for serious development of software that
has to be
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
I just got a nicely worded letter from someone, who's prodded me into
trying once more to ask a ports-philosphy question. It's a question of
This isn't our philosophy list. You must have this confused
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
[ a rant ]
You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do)You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do). The pkgconfig approach is flawed, it doesn't
Chuck Robey wrote:
[Let me emphasize that above a little more: un my mind, you're making a
system that's hostile to progammers, unless they are willing to program
for OpenBSD itself.
I assume you never used OpenBSD for serious development of software that
has to be run on different target pla
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I just got a nicely worded letter from someone, who's prodded me into
> trying once more to ask a ports-philosphy question. It's a question of
This isn't our philosophy list. You must have this confused with misc@
misc@ is the appro
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
[ a rant ]
You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do). The pkgconfig approach is flawed, it doesn't allow for some
things we would do. The gnu configure approach is worse. It has a lot
of assumptions
I just got a nicely worded letter from someone, who's prodded me into
trying once more to ask a ports-philosphy question. It's a question of
how much control to allow a user, for ports. The person I was chatting
with seemed to be of the opinion that the system ought to hage sole
control of al
Hi all,
I have written a port of pycairo-1.0.0. It relies on my cairo ports
(which I have updated to 1.0.2). It also depends on libsvg-cairo
and py-gtk2, since that is what is useful (too me at least).
Note that I completely bypass the provided configure-based
build mechanism, doing it all with py
Hi,
I'm working on my audacity port. I'm facing a strange error (tried on
i386 and macppc). This error happens when building audacity with wxgtk2
and not when building with wxgtk1.
I was wondering if any of the gurus here have an idea about this error :
"/usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.13.0: c
David Krause wrote...
> please test
Works fine on i386-current. Some warning during compile time, nothing
horrendous, seems to work just fine.
Josh
find attached net/pear-Net-URL, used by Horde/IMP.
ok?
pear-Net-URL.tgz
Description: Binary data
> > I really think you ought to consider allowing folks to be able to
> > loosen up on the so strict ports control of files. It's (if this
> > continues like this) going to force me away from all use of ports, if
> > it's won;t let me do anything of my own.
>
> You clearly don't understand the iss
hi
mail/imap-uw has a security problem described in
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=313&type=vulnerabilities&;
attached diff takes the port to version 2004g
ok?
- Marc Balmer
diff -urN -x CVS mail/imap-uw.orig/Makefile mail/imap-uw/Makefile
--- mail/imap-uw.orig/Makefile
Greetings,
I am finally getting around to putting up some of my vacation
images up on a web-site and wanted to use {Image,Perl}Magick
to process them (Scale, Rotate, etc) before putting them up.
I noticed that after calling $img->Rotate(degrees=>-90.0) (for
example) the process would seem to hang
35 matches
Mail list logo
