Hi,
On 05/17/11 04:09, todd rme wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Alexis Ménard wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Davide Bettio wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> What about performances?
>> Well unless we start hacking it, we can't really tell. But in the web
>> context, SVG renders pretty fas
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:09 PM, todd rme wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Alexis Ménard wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Davide Bettio wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> What about performances?
>>
>> Well unless we start hacking it, we can't really tell. But in the web
>> context, SVG rend
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Davide Bettio wrote:
>> Hi,
>> What about performances?
>
> Well unless we start hacking it, we can't really tell. But in the web
> context, SVG renders pretty fast.
I think the concern is more the overhead
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/13/11 15:39, Alexis Ménard wrote:
>> To me the solution lies in WebKit, I asked if the API was stable and
>> it seems that yes it's pretty good. So if we have an interest (which I
>> believe we do a lot), then we should make the
Hi,
On 05/13/11 15:39, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> To me the solution lies in WebKit, I asked if the API was stable and
> it seems that yes it's pretty good. So if we have an interest (which I
> believe we do a lot), then we should make the QtSvg on top of WebKit
> API happens.
>
> :D.
What about perfo
And I'll be happy to help on that respect since I'm working on WebKit every day.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> It's Depecrated, it doesn't mean someone can't come up with a replacement.
>
> QtSvg is buggy, just ask Nuno and it will tell you how much he hates
> that modu
It's Depecrated, it doesn't mean someone can't come up with a replacement.
QtSvg is buggy, just ask Nuno and it will tell you how much he hates
that module. It supports only a subset of the potential of SVG spec
and when I was in Nokia there was no-one to work on it, and we even
broke it badly one
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 19:03:27 Davide Bettio wrote:
> As you can see here [1] QtSvg has been marked as deprecated.
> Do we have any plan about it?
no, because Qt doesn't have a clear plan about it. fortunately for us, QtSvg
is completely hidden behind Plasma::Svg so we can swap it out once Qt
Hi,
As you can see here [1] QtSvg has been marked as deprecated.
Do we have any plan about it?
[1] http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/05/12/qt-modules-maturity-level-the-list
Bye,
Davide Bettio.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
P
