On Thursday 04 March 2010, 13:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> can everyone who wishes to please meet us in #plasma on irc at 16:00 UTC
> this saturday so we can go through our 4.5 plans? thanks, and see you
> there!
I'll try but not sure how good will be the internet connection on the first day
of a c
On Thursday 04 March 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On March 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > after all that fun planning at tokamak, it's time we updated the feature
> > plan for 4.5 :)
>
> ah, yes, thanks for bringing this up.
>
> i think we should also do what we used
On March 3, 2010, Chani wrote:
> after all that fun planning at tokamak, it's time we updated the feature
> plan for 4.5 :)
ah, yes, thanks for bringing this up.
i think we should also do what we used to do before Tokamak came along: have
an irc meeting to discuss this. Tokamak ha
after all that fun planning at tokamak, it's time we updated the feature plan
for 4.5 :) I expect it'll be small, since we're focused on polish, but some of
that polish might count as features...
so, head over to http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.5_Feature_Plan and
a
On December 1, 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> For bugfix releases, some CHANGELOG keyword would be useful, the XML
i've discussed this with the people working on the git transition; i'll
propose something to the release team soon and perhaps we'll have something
when we move to git.
--
Aaron
I might be reading Aaron's respond wrongly, but I think he tried and failed
because of several technical reasons.
I would like help plasma developers work on plasma - not on documenting it's
state. Let the developers write something trivial in a small text file on the
SVN, and I want you to han
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 16:33:10 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Dear Plasma Developers,
>
> Please edit the feature plan:
>
> http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4_Feature_Plan
>
> I'm looking over it, and it all does not make sense. There are many items
> w
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 22:58:12 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> I am aware that this brings lots of work to everyone - but this is one
> solution for this large scale problem.
The problem is that people don't update their features, not that we're lacking
a nifty system.
For the Plasma team, a tex
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 23:58:12 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> I have an idea which might help in qt4.5:
KDE 4.5 of course. Sorry for the mistake.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
is one
solution for this large scale problem.
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 19:13:49 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On December 1, 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Dear Plasma Developers,
> >
> > Please edit the feature plan:
> >
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 22:41:55 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 20:28:43 schrieb Andreas Marschke:
> > How about something like the debian devs made they basically add a note
> > to the changelog like :
> > * corrected text file (closes #1)
> > This works for themas we
Am Dienstag 01 Dezember 2009 20:28:43 schrieb Andreas Marschke:
> How about something like the debian devs made they basically add a note to
> the changelog like :
> * corrected text file (closes #1)
> This works for themas well.
And which is in no way a changelog which could be read by enduse
e could be
> easier :-) As Aaron said there could be a post commit hook which fills in
> the changelog. We directly have the svn rev and the bug number. What it
> needs is a human readable message, instead of "backport rev" ;-)
>
> What if we add a new Keyword CHANGE
umber. What it needs is a
human readable message, instead of "backport rev" ;-)
What if we add a new Keyword CHANGELOG which is used to fill in the text?
Perhaps even make it mandatory if we commit to the branch? And this could be
used for feature plan as well. When using FEATURE on tr
On December 1, 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 18:13:49 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > is there any possibility of improving the situation rather than flogging
> > a dead horse?
>
> Probably. It doesn't help me get a complete list of features *right now*.
i've pointed you t
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 18:13:49 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> is there any possibility of improving the situation rather than flogging a
> dead horse?
Probably. It doesn't help me get a complete list of features *right now*.
I'm all for an improved system that makes it easier to keep track of fe
On December 1, 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Dear Plasma Developers,
>
> Please edit the feature plan:
>
> http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4_Feature_Plan
>
> I'm looking over it, and it all does not make sense. There are many items
> which should be gree
Dear Plasma Developers,
Please edit the feature plan:
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.4_Feature_Plan
I'm looking over it, and it all does not make sense. There are many items which
should be green, but are yellow. That means that you, my fellow developers did
not
update it. I&
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We were chatting on IRC and we thought that it would be a good idea to
> start the 4.3 feature plan so we can start hacking on stuff!
>
> So, what do you think about ? Let's have a meeting on I
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> The battery applet for example loads another battery applet (without the
> popup) into the popup.
it doesn't do so via Applet::load, however. it simply creates a new instance
of a class it already has.
you'll also note that it causes some
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 23:21:53 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:13 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > what is the use case for this?
> >
> > To have panels i
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 15:21 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:13 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > > > The one thing I would like to see more than anything else, finished
>
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:13 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > > The one thing I would like to see more than anything else, finished
> > > floating panel applet and containment that can be embedded i
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 12:13 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> > The one thing I would like to see more than anything else, finished
> > floating panel applet and containment that can be embedded into any
> > plasmoid with a 1 liner.
> >
> > layout->addI
really only necessary for core widgets (taskbar, menu, system tray,
etc) and libplasma, though. you don't need to pass it by anyone to work on new
or existing widgets. that stuff can go straight onto the 4.3 feature plan.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, 0xDeadC0de wrote:
> The one thing I would like to see more than anything else, finished
> floating panel applet and containment that can be embedded into any
> plasmoid with a 1 liner.
>
> layout->addItem(Plasma::Applet::Load("floatpanel")); // for example
what is the
el applet and welcomepanel containment(Should be renamed?))
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 22:14 -0300, Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) wrote:
> Hey!
>
> We were chatting on IRC and we thought that it would be a good idea to start
> the 4.3 feature plan so we can start hacking on stuff!
>
> So, w
Hey!
We were chatting on IRC and we thought that it would be a good idea to start
the 4.3 feature plan so we can start hacking on stuff!
So, what do you think about ? Let's have a meeting on IRC or even start this
conversation using the ML ? (the good about ML is that people that
28 matches
Mail list logo
