be made.
> >
> >Sanford given the API/ABI stability should we be recommending distros
> >package up libddcutil and use this code or would that cause more
> >problems and we should mark it as in-development for this release?
> >
> >Jonathan
> >
&g
d Rockowitz
> -
>
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:52:29 -0400
> From: Sanford Rockowitz
> To: Jonathan Riddell
> Subject: Re: ddcutil .deb
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I've taken a look at your powerdevil code at
> https://cgit.kde.org/powerdevil.git/tree/daemon
should mark it as in-development for this release?
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Sanford Rockowitz -
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:52:29 -0400
From: Sanford Rockowitz
To: Jonathan Riddell
Subject: Re: ddcutil .deb
Jonathan,
I've taken a look at your powerdevil code at
https://
d Rockowitz
To: Jonathan Riddell
Subject: Re: ddcutil .deb
Jonathan,
I've taken a look at your powerdevil code at
https://cgit.kde.org/powerdevil.git/tree/daemon/backends/upower/ddcutilbrightness.cpp.
It can be simplified to improve performance and reliability.
1) The DDCA_Display_Identif
