Hi,
I stopped writing it, since I discovered it's unseful in the new Plasma
Classroom project. In fact, someone (I can't remeber who) said it would be
easier to use iTalc.
Luca Tringali
>Messaggio originale
>Da: kde...@unormal.org
>Data: 05/11/2011 13.53
>A:
&
Am Donnerstag 06 Januar 2011, 11.23:00 schrieb LucaTringali:
Morning
> >(on a side note / as a bit of useless trivia: synchrotron came out of
> >design work i did over the holidays for plasma classroom :)
>
> Talking about plasma classroom, I'm working on a plasmoid that shows the
> screen
> of
On 08.01.2011, at 19:25, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, January 8, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>> On 07.01.2011, at 19:39, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> On Friday, January 7, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
On 07.01.2011, at 01:47, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2011
On Saturday, January 8, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> On 07.01.2011, at 19:39, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Friday, January 7, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> >> On 07.01.2011, at 01:47, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> >> Introducing custom p
On 07.01.2011, at 19:39, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday, January 7, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>> On 07.01.2011, at 01:47, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>
>> Introducing custom parameter kills OCS as a standard because this means
>> that
On Friday, January 7, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> I´m also not sure why the current update system using the version field is
> not usable.
consider 5 addons are installed. with a version check that means:
* sending across a request for each of those 5 items
* on the server, looking up 5 diff
On Friday, January 7, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> On 07.01.2011, at 01:47, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> Introducing custom parameter kills OCS as a standard because this means
> that not all clients can talk to all servers.
which actually
On 07.01.2011, at 12:59, Artur de Souza wrote:
> Hey Frank!
>
> Quoting Frank Karlitschek :
>> Introducing custom parameter kills OCS as a standard because this means that
>> not all clients can talk to all servers.
>> This might not be a problem if some is using only plasma and your server but
Hey Frank!
Quoting Frank Karlitschek :
> Introducing custom parameter kills OCS as a standard because this
> means that not all clients can talk to all servers.
> This might not be a problem if some is using only plasma and your
> server but it breaks the idea of OCS.
Even if it's an optional
On 07.01.2011, at 01:47, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>> Hmm. This parameter is not in the current spec and is not in attica or GHNS
>> supported at the moment and makes it incompatible with clients like the
>> MeeGo Installer an other servers lik
On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> Hmm. This parameter is not in the current spec and is not in attica or GHNS
> supported at the moment and makes it incompatible with clients like the
> MeeGo Installer an other servers like Maemo garage or others. It also
it doesn't make it
On 06.01.2011, at 23:57, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>>> I´m not sure a batch update call is really needed because this call would
>>> have a very low cache hit rate on the server compared wi
On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> > I´m not sure a batch update call is really needed because this call would
> > have a very low cache hit rate on the server compared with atomic checks
> > for single plasmoids.
> >
> >
On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hi..
> >
> > the subject line of this email should be sung to the tune of your
> > favourite superhero t.v. show, such as Italian Spiderman.
> >
> > on boxing day (which is what the Brits a
On Thursday, January 6, 2011, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> I´m not sure a batch update call is really needed because this call would
> have a very low cache hit rate on the server compared with atomic checks
> for single plasmoids.
>
> But a batch check call could be added to the next version of the
On 05.01.2011, at 23:33, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
>> On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
>> if it ends up to be pulled from all KDE users, couldn't it become a bit of
>> a burden for KDE servers?
>
> yes. on the other hand serv
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 02:23, LucaTringali wrote:
>>the subject line of this email should be sung to the tune of your favourite
>>superhero t.v. show, such as Italian Spiderman.
>
> love it!
>
>>* how to automatically check for addons from synchrotron on first-run
>>* how to check for updates so w
>the subject line of this email should be sung to the tune of your favourite
>superhero t.v. show, such as Italian Spiderman.
love it!
>* how to automatically check for addons from synchrotron on first-run
>* how to check for updates so we can offer an auto-update service
>
>i'd like to make thi
On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> if it ends up to be pulled from all KDE users, couldn't it become a bit of
> a burden for KDE servers?
yes. on the other hand servers are pretty powerful these days and this service
is redi
hi..
the subject line of this email should be sung to the tune of your favourite
superhero t.v. show, such as Italian Spiderman.
on boxing day (which is what the Brits and Canuckistanis call the day after
Christmas) i sent an email to this list with the subject GHNS feeds for
plasmoid addons.
20 matches
Mail list logo
