Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday 23 March 2009, Richard Moore wrote: > Asymmetry is evil. true enough ... -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed m

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Richard Moore
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >        bool hidden() const; >        void setHidden(HideState state); Asymmetry is evil. If set takes a HideState then get should return it. Having another method that is a more general helper is ok though. bool hidden() const; void setHi

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday 23 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > so would be necessary an api that a Task implementation can use to say it > wants to be hidden (that the systemtray could or could not respect) > like bool hiddenHint(), that taskarea would use to manipulate > d->hiddenTypes makes sense; there are thr

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, in my effor of flooding the list with updates on the systemtray stuff, this is an update on the status of the systray applet and the support of the new protocol: On Monday 23 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > soo, recappig on the current status: > > movies are now supported (it is a vect

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 23 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > soo, recappig on the current status: > oh, and another problem. leaving the test app with the systemtray icon running for a while, sometimes both the new icon and the fallback ksystemtrayicon are displayed for some seconds, maybe i'm doing something

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-23 Thread Marco Martin
soo, recappig on the current status: movies are now supported (it is a vector of images that travels over dbus) when the icon status is needsattention if a movie is set is displayed this one, otherwise it blinks with the icon set by attentionIcon. (eh, would be really cool to have an unique timer

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > On Friday 20 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > > > expensive enough > > > > well, for animations it probably makes sense to

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday 20 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Friday 20 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > > > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > > > > expensive enoug

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 20 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > > expensive enough > > well, for animations it probably makes sense to send all the frames across > at once and then animate them

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 20 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > On Friday 20 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > > > expensive enough > > > > well, for animations it probably makes sense to s

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-20 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 20 March 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > > expensive enough > > well, for animations it probably makes sense to send all the frames across > at once and then animate them

Re: another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > -setMovie() we are on dbus now, sending the binary data is already > expensive enough well, for animations it probably makes sense to send all the frames across at once and then animate them on the host side. sending images constantly over dbus m

another update on the systray and tiny api review

2009-03-18 Thread Marco Martin
yo chaps, situation of the new systemtry protocol stuff... it basically works, also the client library that is in playground/base/plasma/libknotificationicon and supports all it was on the whiteboard :p there are however still some issues that must be cleared. this mail talks just about the clie