Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 13:57:51 Aleix Pol wrote: > I understand this is a sensible issue for you and I don't have any > intention of arguing it could you answer the question i asked in the email: in what way do you feel that there is too much focus on how applications integrate with plasma? >

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Aleix Pol
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 21:27:47 Aleix Pol wrote: >> Regarding the document, I think it's a great thing to have. I'm a bit >> afraid that we're focusing a bit too much on how do applications >> integrate to Plasma instead of how does Pla

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 17 May 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:12:27 Marco Martin wrote: > > act...@kde.org > > slightly off-topic, but it may be time to merge that mailing list with > plasma- devel and just keep active@ as an alias for it. at this point > there is little, if any, t

Re: Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 17 May 2012 10:34:25 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:12:27 Marco Martin wrote: > > act...@kde.org > > slightly off-topic, but it may be time to merge that mailing list with > plasma- devel and just keep active@ as an alias for it. at this point there > is little, i

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:12:27 Marco Martin wrote: > act...@kde.org slightly off-topic, but it may be time to merge that mailing list with plasma- devel and just keep active@ as an alias for it. at this point there is little, if any, traffic there that would not be appropriate here; the peopl

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 21:27:47 Aleix Pol wrote: > Regarding the document, I think it's a great thing to have. I'm a bit > afraid that we're focusing a bit too much on how do applications > integrate to Plasma instead of how does Plasma integrate applications. how so? > Furthermore, I see thi

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-17 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 17 May 2012, Rick Stockton wrote: > > BTW, Does the 'Active' project have a separate ML? (If it does, I should > go ahead and start lurking!) As you probably know already, I am going to act...@kde.org -- Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel maili

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-16 Thread Rick Stockton
On 05/16/2012 12:07 PM, Aleix Poi wrote: Furthermore, I see things like "on-screen keyboard" in this document. From my point of view, this sprint should be about how to iterate KDE on the desktop systems (with this mouse and keyboard we've all grown to love), others are already taken care of by

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 16 May 2012, Aleix Pol wrote: > integrate to Plasma instead of how does Plasma integrate applications. > I have to catch up with all the literature that has happened today :). > > Furthermore, I see things like "on-screen keyboard" in this document. > From my point of view, this sprin

Re: Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-16 Thread Aleix Pol
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > So, to put it in a new thread: > possible work plan and methodology: > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Workspace_Sprint > > is completely open, anybody that wants to modify it is welcome to do so. > > other thing and topic, since is about that

Workspace sprint, workplan/methodology

2012-05-16 Thread Marco Martin
So, to put it in a new thread: possible work plan and methodology: http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Workspace_Sprint is completely open, anybody that wants to modify it is welcome to do so. other thing and topic, since is about that sprint anyways, infos about the place, how to reach etc would be