Re: Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Merging proposal

2018-07-24 Thread Ivan Čukić
What to do with X11? I don't like the idea that we have two completely different behaviours for W and X. Cheers, Ivan

Re: Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Merging proposal

2018-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:37 PM Ivan Čukić wrote: > There is one question, though. Do the new VDs support showing a window > on two different VDs? the wayland protocol can associate windows on any subset of vds, yes -- Marco Martin

Re: Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Merging proposal

2018-07-24 Thread Ivan Čukić
So, if I understood this correctly, KAMD keeps a list of activities, and a list of VDs which are usually mapped 1-1, but could also be 1-n. Adding an activity would mean adding a VD (just one by default). Removing an activity would mean removing all VDs for that activity. This could be (I think)

Re: Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Merging proposal

2018-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:47 PM David Edmundson wrote: > - If someone else wants to add new effects/pagers that group/filter VDs they > should be able to. > (like Michails quite cool mockups and stuff) I don't think that requires any > changes in the VD protocol to do so, and we definitely sho

Virtual Desktop and Activities future: Merging proposal

2018-07-16 Thread David Edmundson
Was asked to copy and paste my comments from the main thread into a new thread. Motiviation Most people use one or the other, both offer half arsed things you expect from some kind of logical window grouping system. - Users of activities don't get hot edges / effects / whatever - Users of VDs