Hello!
Sorry for the delay :P
Quoting "Aaron J. Seigo" :
> imho: it probably makes more sense to keep them separate as they are
> different
> kinds of tasks, even if related. the structure could be similar/the same,
> however.
+1
> i'd even think that a URL shortener dataengine could easily b
On Sunday, December 5, 2010, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> Is it possible to offer GHNS from a javascript engine or an engine at all?
yes; though DataEngines themselves offer no UI. it is usually exposed from a
plasmoid's UI (configuration, usually)
> I need to have a look at the new share engine; where
On Sunday, December 5, 2010, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> As I was fiddling around with an URL shortener plasmoid similar to the
> pastebin plasmoid I was thinking if it would be an idea to also provide
> URL Shortener services in the same engine or id would be better to have a
> separate one?
imho: it p
