On Friday 10 April 2009 19:38:24 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > Still that doesn't make it any easier to interpret say '3/4' in front of
> > a
>
> ah and if all are completed, then you can just say "N" instead of "N/N" ...
>
> so to be ++ verbose, this w
Aaron J. Seigo wrote
> ...
> so to be ++ verbose, this would give us (where N = notification, P = job in
> progress, C = job completed):
>
> ScenarioText
> --
> 3 N3
> 3 N, 2 P3/5
> 3 N, 1 C, 1 P4/5
> 1 C, 2 P1/3
> 2 P0
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> Still that doesn't make it any easier to interpret say '3/4' in front of a
ah and if all are completed, then you can just say "N" instead of "N/N" ...
so to be ++ verbose, this would give us (where N = notification, P = job in
progress, C = job c
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> Still that doesn't make it any easier to interpret say '3/4' in front of a
> spinner.
to me it says "there are four things here, three of which are completed"
notifications can therefore be viewed as jobs that completed in zero time.
--
Aaron J.
On Friday 10 April 2009 18:58:53 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > Well, the problem kind of is that the systray shows multiple things:
> > running jobs and notifications, which are distinctively different. Still
>
> are they?
>
> both are communicating sys
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> Well, the problem kind of is that the systray shows multiple things:
> running jobs and notifications, which are distinctively different. Still
are they?
both are communicating system or application status to the user; both might
offer interactio
On Friday 10 April 2009 17:50:54 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > I've been doing some more thinking about this: what about splitting this
> > up in 2 icons? One "i" icon with a number that shows the total amount of
> > notifications, and the spinner with a
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:04:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > > > On Monday
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:04:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > > On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > > wha
On April 9, 2009 11:31:28 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2009 19:55:49 Chani wrote:
> > how do you warn the user if they close their laptop lid? :)
> > it does make sense for all other triggers, though.
> >
> > ...hmm, if the warning had a sound effect I might notice when closing my
On Thursday 09 April 2009 19:55:49 Chani wrote:
> how do you warn the user if they close their laptop lid? :)
> it does make sense for all other triggers, though.
>
> ...hmm, if the warning had a sound effect I might notice when closing my
> laptop. *most* of the time I also wait for it to finish s
On April 9, 2009 09:08:38 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2009 17:48:20 dantti85-...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
> > >Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
> > >"notification closed" is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the
> > > same as the user might ju
On Thursday 09 April 2009 17:48:20 dantti85-...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
> >Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
> >"notification closed" is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the same
> > as the user might just notice the "it's gone" and not whereto. There have
> >
On Thursday 09 April 2009 16:47:41 Sven Burmeister wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. April 2009 16:30:21 schrieb Rob Scheepmaker:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
> > systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some
> > of this alrea
>Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
>"notification closed" is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the same as
>the user might just notice the "it's gone" and not whereto. There have been
>people stating that they thought the job was done because the notifi
Am Montag, 6. April 2009 16:30:21 schrieb Rob Scheepmaker:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
> systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some
> of this already at tokamak, but there's still a lot to be done if we want
> this to
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:23:49 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> Yeah, it contains notifications (both 'normal' and file completed), and
> jobs, so indeed it may not be entirely optimal. However, both the in
> progress jobs and the completed jobs belong to an ExtenderGroup. The thing
> that might help is
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:20:40 Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 09:04:32 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> > bonus is that we already have the spinner and we've been using it around
> > kde (plasma, gwenview, dolphin .. i keep seeing
On Monday 06 April 2009 09:04:32 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> > I think the idea of using animation to indicate a current job running is
> > a good idea. Is there an icon designed for this yet? At first I thought
> > of an animated Down arrow (a met
On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > what about the busy widget we have? we could just use that, with a
>
On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > what about the busy widget we have? we could just use that, with a
> > > number in the middle of it showing how many jobs are
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > > * job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think
> > > this could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > * job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think this
> > could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space vertically. I'm
> > not sure how we can keep the widget
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> * job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think this
> could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space vertically. I'm not
> sure how we can keep the widget compact while still showing all the
> information (we'll need t
Hello,
I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some of
this already at tokamak, but there's still a lot to be done if we want this to
be implemented for 4.3:
* job widget layout. I don't know about
25 matches
Mail list logo