---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Sept. 26, 2016, 8:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 nachm., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 nachm., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 nachm., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 p.m., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
>
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
yes, there should be a line fo
> On Sept. 9, 2016, 1:24 nachm., David Rosca wrote:
> > You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look exactly the
> > same (just icon, no line).
Aw, crap. Right. For Icon Tasks there's no label for the active windows.
- Kai Uwe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review99025
---
You can't tell apart launcher and normal task now, they look
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Sept. 9, 2016, 1:20 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On Sept. 2, 2016, 8:15 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > no, don't like lines at the bottom for bottom panels at all, the whole
> > point was to make it look the same as open plasmoids (which no, not going
> > to change, at least not for 5.8).
> > i would rather keep the current squares then.
>
> On Sept. 2, 2016, 8:15 vorm., Marco Martin wrote:
> > no, don't like lines at the bottom for bottom panels at all, the whole
> > point was to make it look the same as open plasmoids (which no, not going
> > to change, at least not for 5.8).
> > i would rather keep the current squares then.
>
> On Sept. 2, 2016, 8:15 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > no, don't like lines at the bottom for bottom panels at all, the whole
> > point was to make it look the same as open plasmoids (which no, not going
> > to change, at least not for 5.8).
> > i would rather keep the current squares then.
>
> On Sept. 2, 2016, 8:15 vorm., Marco Martin wrote:
> > no, don't like lines at the bottom for bottom panels at all, the whole
> > point was to make it look the same as open plasmoids (which no, not going
> > to change, at least not for 5.8).
> > i would rather keep the current squares then.
A
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98828
---
no, don't like lines at the bottom for bottom panels at all,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Sept. 2, 2016, 7:16 vorm.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Sept. 2, 2016, 7:12 vorm.)
Review request for Plasma.
Reposito
> On Aug. 30, 2016, 10:57 nachm., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Tech-wise I have no objections, the SVG looks clean.
> >
> > Design-wise I'm conflicted. Unlike the old implementation of the lines,
> > this time no attempt was made to vert-center the content in the remaining
> > negative space. This avo
> On Aug. 30, 2016, 10:57 nachm., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Tech-wise I have no objections, the SVG looks clean.
> >
> > Design-wise I'm conflicted. Unlike the old implementation of the lines,
> > this time no attempt was made to vert-center the content in the remaining
> > negative space. This avo
> On Aug. 30, 2016, 10:57 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Tech-wise I have no objections, the SVG looks clean.
> >
> > Design-wise I'm conflicted. Unlike the old implementation of the lines,
> > this time no attempt was made to vert-center the content in the remaining
> > negative space. This avoid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98803
---
Ship it!
Tech-wise I have no objections, the SVG looks cle
> On Aug. 30, 2016, 10:30 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > I can't seem to review this because the patch doesn't contain the changed
> > binary file. I was unable to download the svgz from the web UI or via
> > reviewboard-am. I don't know if Reviewboard supports any patch format with
> > binary con
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98799
---
I can't seem to review this because the patch doesn't contain
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 30, 2016, 3:54 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 30, 2016, 2:22 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98791
---
+1
Perfect.
(I would still like Eike to look over the margi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 30, 2016, 2:04 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Repositor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 30, 2016, 2:03 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Repositor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 30, 2016, 2:02 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
> On Aug. 30, 2016, 8:43 vorm., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > Nice work!
> >
> > Combining the best of both worlds, unintrusive lines where possible but
> > filled background where needed.
> >
> > I like that the text somewhat "sits" on the line (top panel) but descenders
> > of letters like "g"
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98786
---
Nice work!
Combining the best of both worlds, unintrusive li
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98778
---
nice. I want to take a close look at the details of the SVG t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/#review98777
---
Looks really nice!
- Ivan Čukić
On Aug. 29, 2016, 10:21 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:20 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:21 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:20 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Reposito
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:19 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:18 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:13 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Reposito
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
(Updated Aug. 29, 2016, 10:11 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Reposito
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128802/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
41 matches
Mail list logo
