> On Jan. 10, 2016, 3:06 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > That sounds like you're saying Qt has broken API.
> > If that's true, they'll want to know about it.
>
> David Kahles wrote:
> I talked to them (see https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/144823/) and
> it seems like we shouldn't hav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126691/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2016, 11:56 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On Jan. 10, 2016, 2:06 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > That sounds like you're saying Qt has broken API.
> > If that's true, they'll want to know about it.
>
> David Kahles wrote:
> I talked to them (see https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/144823/) and
> it seems like we shouldn't hav
> On Jan. 10, 2016, 1:06 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > That sounds like you're saying Qt has broken API.
> > If that's true, they'll want to know about it.
>
> David Kahles wrote:
> I talked to them (see https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/144823/) and
> it seems like we shouldn't hav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126691/#review92129
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Jan. 10, 2016, 1
> On Jan. 10, 2016, 2:06 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > That sounds like you're saying Qt has broken API.
> > If that's true, they'll want to know about it.
I talked to them (see https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/144823/) and it
seems like we shouldn't have done it like it was before, it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126691/#review90839
---
That sounds like you're saying Qt has broken API.
If that's t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126691/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-workspace
Description
---
