---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/#review102451
---
If this diff is still appropriate please reopen on http://ph
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2017, 12:03 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/#review76103
---
sorry for the delay. I was basically without Internet all of l
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 8:23 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I find it hard to
> > review as there are so many changes to different areas. Especially I think
> > there are a few no-brainer which could go in quickly, while the threaded
> > fi
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 7:23 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I find it hard to
> > review as there are so many changes to different areas. Especially I think
> > there are a few no-brainer which could go in quickly, while the threaded
> > fi
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 7:23 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I find it hard to
> > review as there are so many changes to different areas. Especially I think
> > there are a few no-brainer which could go in quickly, while the threaded
> > fi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2015, 5:08 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Repository
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 8:23 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I find it hard to
> > review as there are so many changes to different areas. Especially I think
> > there are a few no-brainer which could go in quickly, while the threaded
> > fi
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 7:23 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I find it hard to
> > review as there are so many changes to different areas. Especially I think
> > there are a few no-brainer which could go in quickly, while the threaded
> > fi
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 6:57 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As I worked on that just yesterday: you cannot filter in a different thread
> > as Klipper is not thread save. Please see
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122382/ for how I solved the problem. I
> > suggest to rebase the patch on top
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/#review75260
---
could you please split the review in a per-commit review? I fi
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 7:57 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As I worked on that just yesterday: you cannot filter in a different thread
> > as Klipper is not thread save. Please see
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122382/ for how I solved the problem. I
> > suggest to rebase the patch on top
> On Feb. 3, 2015, 6:57 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > As I worked on that just yesterday: you cannot filter in a different thread
> > as Klipper is not thread save. Please see
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122382/ for how I solved the problem. I
> > suggest to rebase the patch on top
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/#review75255
---
As I worked on that just yesterday: you cannot filter in a dif
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/
---
(Updated Feb. 3, 2015, 6:27 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Repository
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122392/
---
(Updated Feb. 2, 2015, 6:44 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Summary (u
16 matches
Mail list logo
