---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119813/
---
(Updated Nov. 5, 2014, 12:46 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
On Monday, August 18, 2014 18:21:39 Eike Hein wrote:
> ^ That seems better to me. I mean it still means having a known list
> somewhere (the hints) but the process for extending/maintaining that list
> seems reasonable (-> community discourse). I imagine if we had something
> like Python's PEP proc
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
> On Aug. 17, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Eike Hein wrote:
> > Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that would like to
> > hide activities support from plasmashell for complexity reasons. Is there a
> > way to disable activities support, and does it have an API we could use to
> > condit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119813/#review64674
---
Looks good, but: I'm aware of at least one downstream that wou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119813/
---
Review request for Plasma, Eike Hein, Marco Martin, and Sebastian Kügler.
18 matches
Mail list logo
