> On 2010-03-10 19:44:48, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > Looks ok to me.
> >
> > One small nitpick: Please do not do
> > Foo* foo = new Foo;
> > foo->doSomething();
> > delete foo;
> >
> > The object can be normally allocated on the stack without risking a leak or
> > requiring the extra work of dynam
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3240/#review4458
---
Ship it!
Looks ok to me.
One small nitpick: Please do not do
Foo* fo
On Wednesday 10 of March 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 13:22:04 Davide Bettio wrote:
> > > On 2010-03-10 07:28:38, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > > Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing,
> > > > so I would say it can be removed completely.
> >
On March 10, 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> This is a non-feature IMO as it's hardly discoverable and can easily result
> a screen not getting locked because the user left the mouse in the wrong
> position, leading to security risks.
a) people do use this (i even worked on improvements to the fea
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, wrote:
> Just to give a bit of perspective -- I have seen this type of behavior on
> other platforms before. It's been around for several years so it's not
> completely out of the blue.
>
> Of course, I can't remember the specifics. It seems to me that it may hav
Just to give a bit of perspective -- I have seen this type of behavior on
other platforms before. It's been around for several years so it's not
completely out of the blue.
Of course, I can't remember the specifics. It seems to me that it may have
been an add-on behavior to Windows or the A
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 13:22:04 Davide Bettio wrote:
> > > On 2010-03-10 07:28:38, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > > Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing,
> > > > so I would say it can be removed completely.
> >
>
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 13:22:04 Davide Bettio wrote:
> > On 2010-03-10 07:28:38, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing, so
> > > I would say it can be removed completely.
>
> If you keep the mouse in a corner the screensaver will not st
> On 2010-03-10 07:28:38, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing, so I
> > would say it can be removed completely.
>
> Davide Bettio wrote:
> If you keep the mouse in a corner the screensaver will not start and the
> screen will not be
> On 2010-03-10 07:28:38, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing, so I
> > would say it can be removed completely.
If you keep the mouse in a corner the screensaver will not start and the screen
will not be locked.
- Davide
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3240/#review4441
---
Why do we still need prevent screen locking? It seems to do nothing, s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3240/
---
Review request for Plasma, Martin Gräßlin and Lubos Lunak.
Summary
---
1) R
12 matches
Mail list logo
