> On Aug. 11, 2011, 7:56 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > if i read this correctly, this means that the name of the package on the
> > system needs to be the name of the dataengine. e.g. org.kde.foobar or
> > whatever. is that going to be ok for packagers?
> >
> > also, this work needs to shift
> On Aug. 11, 2011, 7:56 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > if i read this correctly, this means that the name of the package on the
> > system needs to be the name of the dataengine. e.g. org.kde.foobar or
> > whatever. is that going to be ok for packagers?
> >
> > also, this work needs to shift
> On Aug. 11, 2011, 7:56 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > if i read this correctly, this means that the name of the package on the
> > system needs to be the name of the dataengine. e.g. org.kde.foobar or
> > whatever. is that going to be ok for packagers?
> >
> > also, this work needs to shift
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/#review5618
---
if i read this correctly, this means that the name of the packag
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/
---
(Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 10:10 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102291/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
This is another part of my GSo
