---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/#review14906
---
what is the status of this? has been pushed? is pretty old, sho
> On March 13, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved position is
> > invalid, like either negative or an enormous value.
> >
> > this shouldn't break it (is even quite probable a value not being valid
> > anymore because there
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 16, 2012, 4:31 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Se
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 16, 2012, 1:47 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Se
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 16, 2012, 10:02 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. S
> On March 13, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved position is
> > invalid, like either negative or an enormous value.
> >
> > this shouldn't break it (is even quite probable a value not being valid
> > anymore because there
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 13, 2012, 6:44 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Se
> On March 13, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved position is
> > invalid, like either negative or an enormous value.
> >
> > this shouldn't break it (is even quite probable a value not being valid
> > anymore because there
> On March 13, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved position is
> > invalid, like either negative or an enormous value.
> >
> > this shouldn't break it (is even quite probable a value not being valid
> > anymore because there
> On March 13, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved position is
> > invalid, like either negative or an enormous value.
> >
> > this shouldn't break it (is even quite probable a value not being valid
> > anymore because there
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 13, 2012, 1:51 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Se
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/#review11354
---
looks good, a thing i would like to be tested is when the saved
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
(Updated March 13, 2012, 1:06 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Se
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104258/
---
Review request for Plasma, Aaron J. Seigo, Marco Martin, and Fredrik Höglund
14 matches
Mail list logo
