---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17183
---
This review has been submitted with commit
79be54420991a94d824
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17182
---
This review has been submitted with commit
4f375dcb1ce4cf09777
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17180
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Aug. 9, 2012, 12:08 a.m
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough:
> > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as
> > well (it disables the mouse area so should work)
> > b) now a touch version without effec
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough:
> > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as
> > well (it disables the mouse area so should work)
> > b) now a touch version without effec
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough:
> > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as
> > well (it disables the mouse area so should work)
> > b) now a touch version without effec
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough:
> > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as
> > well (it disables the mouse area so should work)
> > b) now a touch version without effec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17158
---
i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:31 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the opacity
> > would actually increase on hover.
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> Yes, I know. If everybody agrees I can change that.
while makes more semantically sense, i
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:37 p.m., Daker Pinheiro wrote:
> > I like this kind of behavior, but I think that more people should aprove it.
> > Exporting the containsMouse property as well as the background is another
> > solution that doesn't breaks
> > existing code.
Well, here we're not adding any
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:31 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the opacity
> > would actually increase on hover.
Yes, I know. If everybody agrees I can change that.
- Aleix
---
This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17154
---
I like this kind of behavior, but I think that more people shou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17153
---
I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/
---
Review request for Plasma, Marco Martin and Daker Pinheiro.
Description
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
