---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4898/#review9913
---
Ship it!
what's the status of this patch for KDE 4.6?
it makes c
> On 2010-08-06 07:10:08, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > personally, i'm fine with the patch, if only for correctness in terms of
> > "as few hard requirements as possible."
> >
> > in practice, i find the usefulness of the patch to be dubious, but it can't
> > hurt to at least allow it to be optional
> On 2010-08-04 16:08:34, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > The change looks OK, but I am wondering why you do not want to link with
> > DBusMenuQt. Having (very) different code paths is potentially a source of
> > trouble for maintenance.
>
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> Having that kind of library as a h
> On 2010-08-06 07:10:08, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > personally, i'm fine with the patch, if only for correctness in terms of
> > "as few hard requirements as possible."
> >
> > in practice, i find the usefulness of the patch to be dubious, but it can't
> > hurt to at least allow it to be optional
> On 2010-08-06 07:10:08, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > personally, i'm fine with the patch, if only for correctness in terms of
> > "as few hard requirements as possible."
> >
> > in practice, i find the usefulness of the patch to be dubious, but it can't
> > hurt to at least allow it to be optional
> On 2010-08-04 16:08:34, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > The change looks OK, but I am wondering why you do not want to link with
> > DBusMenuQt. Having (very) different code paths is potentially a source of
> > trouble for maintenance.
>
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> Having that kind of library as a h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4898/#review6836
---
did you try if besides compiling the menus still show up correctly?
as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4898/
---
(Updated 2010-08-06 12:34:16.273483)
Review request for kdelibs, Plasma and Marc
