> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
On October 5, 2009, Nathanael Schilling wrote:
> > On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design.
> > > the window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening
> > > in the shell to do so properly. what, exactly,
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
> On 2009-10-01 19:24:19, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> > shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> > draw the wal
On Friday 02 October 2009, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2009 21:24:13 Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> > window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in
> > the shell to do so properly. what
On Thursday 01 October 2009 21:24:13 Aaron Seigo wrote:
> anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design. the
> window manager does not have enough knowledge of what is happening in the
> shell to do so properly. what, exactly, is the benefit of letting compiz
> draw the wa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1755/#review2515
---
anything but the desktop shell painting the wallpaper is poor design.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1755/
---
(Updated 2009-10-01 18:07:49.885277)
Review request for Plasma.
Summary (updat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1755/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
Since revision 928340 (http://websvn
13 matches
Mail list logo
