On Tuesday 14 September 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> > i think options are basically 2:
> > - try to write something simple that doesn't use
> > qdeclarativeopenmetaobject that could be even a bit overkill for it,
> > will try today
> > - keep an internal copy of all the thing if it's likely to be e
On Monday 13 September 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> > For the use of private classes on dataengine bindings: also don't expect
> > for 4.7 the export of classes...it may happen on 4.8 but no idea when
> > it's going out :P So we need to think together about a way of getting
> > rid of it. Which priv
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> - with konact mobile... yes, i feel potentilly there is a quite big amount
> of duplication, honestly didn't had the energy to ctually check tough :)
oh, and i've actually started talking with Kevin about this ... we'll see
where it goes. :)
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * Activities
> - i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
> netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
personally, i think that for plasma-netbook itself
On Monday 13 September 2010, Chani wrote:
> > * Activities
> >
> > - i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
> >
> > netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
>
> iirc at akademy we agreed it was better... although there was some talk
> about getting the
>
> * Activities
> - i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
> netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
iirc at akademy we agreed it was better... although there was some talk about
getting the session stuff stable first? hrm. should've written things d
Hi,
Sorry I didn't attend, went house-hacking and had a birthday party last
weekend, didn't do much computer-stuff as a result. Let me add my plans
anyway.
On Monday, September 13, 2010 00:13:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
> ir
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur Duque de Souza wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Monday 13 September 2010 16:10:54 Marco Martin wrote:
> > now, maybe when qtcomponents will be ready it could be decided to just
> > use those widgets, again if they will be good enough for the desktop.
>
> That's what I'
Hi Marco,
On Monday 13 September 2010 16:10:54 Marco Martin wrote:
> now, maybe when qtcomponents will be ready it could be decided to just use
> those widgets, again if they will be good enough for the desktop.
That's what I'm trying to say: qt-components will probably never be "ready" as
the c
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur de Souza wrote:
> Quoting Marco Martin :
> > well, not really faster, since the binding of the widgets is exactly the
> > only part that right now is finished and working perfectly.
> > the problem as usual, is the layouting, bad interaction between the qgw
> > ba
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi all..
>
> thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
> irc:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
another thing i did forgot to add before:
i'll have to finish the dataengine caching gsoc (also there, i h
Quoting Marco Martin :
> well, not really faster, since the binding of the widgets is exactly the only
> part that right now is finished and working perfectly.
> the problem as usual, is the layouting, bad interaction between the qgw based
> ones and qdi based ones, but at least is possible to obta
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur de Souza wrote:
> Quoting Marco Martin :
> > * QtComponents/ QML bindings
> >
> > - we need a timeframe for QtComponents, but i guess it will pass a
> >
> > quite long
> > time before it makes it in a qt release
> >
> > - i think that for this reason bindings
Quoting Marco Martin :
> * QtComponents/ QML bindings
> - we need a timeframe for QtComponents, but i guess it will pass a
> quite long
> time before it makes it in a qt release
> - i think that for this reason bindings for the plasma widgets are still
> needed, at worst the plasma widgets coul
A Segunda, 13 de Setembro de 2010 09:45:38 Marco Martin você escreveu:
> On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hi all..
> >
> > thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
> > irc:
> >
> > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
>
> ok, thanks a lot,
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi all..
>
> thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
> irc:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
ok, thanks a lot, and sorry aain to not be able to be there.
I have some points to make/questions to ask o
Oh, fsck, meeting was yesterday and not today... sorry...
On 13 September 2010 00:13, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi all..
>
> thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on irc:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
>
> --
>
> Aaron J. Seigo
>
> humru othro a kohnu se
17 matches
Mail list logo
