On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 13:37:09 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> IMHO it should all be in workspace on pko. If we drop out of the SC (and
> given some comments on the threads, that seems to be common agreement) we
> don't need extragear anymore for workspace stuff.
i honestly think this would be the
here are my current thoughts on these questions:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 17:51:50 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * where should the repositories live?
i'd like to see a single Workspaces category on projects.kde.org. the current
kde-workspace repo would be moved to it, and we'd add in all the other
On Monday 14 January 2013 17:51:50 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * where should the repositories live?
> * 1 place, such as a single "workspaces" topic on projects.kde.org
> * scattered: some in kde-workspaces and some in extragear/base (and
> elsewhere)
> * ??
IMHO it should all be in
> * where should the repositories live?
Each project should be in his own repo but in a way that makes compile it easy
(./kdesrc-build kde-workspace, done).
> * what should the devel strategy of these repositories be?
> * what should the release cycle of these repositories be?
Whatever fits best
On Monday, January 14, 2013 20:54:56 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > the question we have is:
> > how do we want to bring these various repositories together
> > into a coherent, usable result?
>
> most of them are projects of quite different, so
On Monday 14 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi..
>
> as Alex noted in an email in the "reflecting on 4.10" thread, we have
> several current and upcoming git repos that are topically part of the
> workspaces. such repositories include:
>
> * bluedevil
> * networkmanagement
> * kscreen (it'
