Marco Martin wrote:
> can you do a phab review about it?
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5470
Marco Martin wrote:
>> Am I right that the argument `QFlags state` should simply be `State
>> state`?
>
> can you do a phab review about it?
Of course, but that seemed a bit overkill if this is an evident error, or if
ultimately the runtime behaviour remains the same.
I understand from a diago
>Am I right that the argument `QFlags state` should simply be `State
state`?
Yes.
On Friday 14 April 2017 08:46:20 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The QtCurve style fails to build against Qt 5.9.0: it triggers a
> compile-time assert in the QFlags class on the function below.
>
> Am I right that the argument `QFlags state` should simply be `State
> state`?
can you do a phab