Re: Libtaskmanager ported to Qt5/KF5

2013-08-11 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 15:02:31 Heena Mahour wrote: > Does that mean now window-list can be ported to plasma2 (it requires tasks > data engine)..? Yes, at least as far as the tasks engine in Plasma 2 works, I think it doesn't. (That'd then be the first thing to fix.) For this you need kdelib

Re: Libtaskmanager ported to Qt5/KF5

2013-08-11 Thread Heena Mahour
Hi, Does that mean now window-list can be ported to plasma2 (it requires tasks data engine)..? Regards On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Eike Hein wrote: > On Friday 09 August 2013 14:09:29 you wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > on special request by Eike I looked into porting libtaskmanager to > Qt5/K

Re: Libtaskmanager ported to Qt5/KF5

2013-08-09 Thread Eike Hein
On Friday 09 August 2013 14:09:29 you wrote: > Hi all, > > on special request by Eike I looked into porting libtaskmanager to Qt5/KF5. > And after a surprisingly easy port I just pushed to frameworks-scratch > branch a commit which enables building of libtaskmanager again. Thanks :) Nice to hear

Re: Libtaskmanager ported to Qt5/KF5

2013-08-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, August 09, 2013 14:09:29 Martin Graesslin wrote: > on special request by Eike I looked into porting libtaskmanager to Qt5/KF5. > And after a surprisingly easy port I just pushed to frameworks-scratch > branch a commit which enables building of libtaskmanager again. > > As a side effect

Re: Libtaskmanager ported to Qt5/KF5

2013-08-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, August 09, 2013 14:09:29 Martin Graesslin wrote: > on special request by Eike I looked into porting libtaskmanager to Qt5/KF5. > And after a surprisingly easy port I just pushed to frameworks-scratch > branch a commit which enables building of libtaskmanager again. > > As a side effect

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-22 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > I would say we should really take the new widget since i don't think we can > just shortly add some grouping functions to the old widget. it really wouldn't be that much work if we keep it simple and e.g. mimic what we had in kicker (colla

RE: libtaskmanager

2008-09-22 Thread christian mollekopf
sorry, i forgot to upload the changes. it should compile now.Regards> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: plasma-devel@kde.org> Subject: Re: libtaskmanager> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:24:43 +0200> > On Sunday 21 September 2008, Christian Mollekopf wrote:> > Hi,> >> &g

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-22 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > Hi, > > I would say we should really take the new widget since i don't think we can > just shortly add some grouping functions to the old widget. The new widget > actually worked quite well, but now i introduced some new problemes while > tu

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Christian Mollekopf wrote: > Hi, > > I would say we should really take the new widget since i don't think we can > just shortly add some grouping functions to the old widget. The new widget > actually worked quite well, but now i introduced some new problemes while > tu

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-21 Thread Christian Mollekopf
Hi, I would say we should really take the new widget since i don't think we can just shortly add some grouping functions to the old widget. The new widget actually worked quite well, but now i introduced some new problemes while turning the LayoutWidget from a QGraphicsItem into a QGraphicsLin

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 19 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > hi all ... > > > > i merged in the grouping task manager library today from the grouping > > branch. i then went through and did a bunch of clean ups. there is likely > > much let to be done,

Re: libtaskmanager

2008-09-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 18 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi all ... > > i merged in the grouping task manager library today from the grouping > branch. i then went through and did a bunch of clean ups. there is likely > much let to be done, but we should now have grouping and what not available > in