Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-22 Thread Chani
On February 22, 2009 08:17:57 Richard Dale wrote: > 2009/2/20 Aaron J. Seigo > > > On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > > > Yes, but how does that differ from just adding > > > createConfigurationInterface() to the scripting api in addition to > > > showConfigurationInterace()? > > >

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-22 Thread Richard Dale
2009/2/20 Aaron J. Seigo > On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > > Yes, but how does that differ from just adding > > createConfigurationInterface() to the scripting api in addition to > > showConfigurationInterace()? > > because that would only work nicely for the Python and Ruby scr

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-20 Thread Chani
On February 20, 2009 12:23:48 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > > Yes, but how does that differ from just adding > > createConfigurationInterface() to the scripting api in addition to > > showConfigurationInterace()? > have you guys looked at my last patches

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > Yes, but how does that differ from just adding > createConfigurationInterface() to the scripting api in addition to > showConfigurationInterace()? because that would only work nicely for the Python and Ruby script engines. for everything else, the

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-20 Thread Richard Dale
2009/2/20 Aaron J. Seigo > On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > > Here because 'if (d->script)' is true, it will call > > showConfigurationInterface on the scripting engine which doesn\'t have > the > > KConfigDialog stuff in it. > > KConfigDialog *AppletScript::standardConfiguration

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday 20 February 2009, Richard Dale wrote: > Here because 'if (d->script)' is true, it will call > showConfigurationInterface on the scripting engine which doesn\'t have the > KConfigDialog stuff in it. KConfigDialog *AppletScript::standardConfigurationDialog()? -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othr

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-20 Thread Richard Dale
2009/2/19 Aaron J. Seigo > On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Kleiner wrote: > > On Thursday, 19. February 2009 16:55:38 Thomas Coopman wrote: > > > I have been running in the same problem and have looked a bit at the > code > > > and it looks like createConfigurationInterface is not in Apple

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Kleiner wrote: > On Thursday, 19. February 2009 16:55:38 Thomas Coopman wrote: > > I have been running in the same problem and have looked a bit at the code > > and it looks like createConfigurationInterface is not in AppletScript so > > there are some changes

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-19 Thread Benjamin Kleiner
On Thursday, 19. February 2009 16:55:38 Thomas Coopman wrote: > I have been running in the same problem and have looked a bit at the code > and it looks like createConfigurationInterface is not in AppletScript so > there are some changes needed to solve this. > > But if it is possible to use showCo

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Kleiner wrote: > I have played around with the python bindings for plasma, and I noticed > that the config dialog can't be "hijacked", so my question to you is, why do you want to do this? > since > plasmascript.Applet.createConfigurationInterface() won't

Re: discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

2009-02-19 Thread Thomas Coopman
I have been running in the same problem and have looked a bit at the code and it looks like createConfigurationInterface is not in AppletScript so there are some changes needed to solve this. But if it is possible to use showConfiguration and get the same dialog I would like to know how too. 200