On November 12, 2009, Pekka Reijula wrote:
> Our idea allows creation of plasmoids that have qtscript inside to your own
> plama desktop environment. We can extend plasma in a way that allows user
> to write own script with for example Kate or download it from http url.
> The basic idea is that o
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Artur Souza (MoRpHeUz)
wrote:
> Hey Richard!
>
> On Friday 13 November 2009, 07:44 Richard Dale wrote:
>> The QtScript bindings based on the language indpendent Smoke libraries
>> are going well, and I'm not far short of being able to wrap the Plasma
>> apis.
>
>
Hey Richard!
On Friday 13 November 2009, 07:44 Richard Dale wrote:
> The QtScript bindings based on the language indpendent Smoke libraries
> are going well, and I'm not far short of being able to wrap the Plasma
> apis.
Just one question: when this is done, we'll be able to "drop" the bindings w
Hi Pekka,
On Friday 13 November 2009, 04:32 Pekka Reijula wrote:
> Our idea allows creation of plasmoids that have qtscript inside to your own
> plama desktop environment. We can extend plasma in a way that allows user
> to write own script with for example Kate or download it from http url.
> T
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Pekka Reijula wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> I suspect the answer to the subject is "no" since I haven't found a
>> mention of a method to do it. But I also haven't found comprehensive
>> QtScript API docs. :)
> QtScript apidocs are gener
On November 12, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> Amarok scripts don't have much to do with plasmoids, so no not really.
> If we wanted to share code it would have to be in the form of some
> sort of kdelibs package signing library. But I'm not sure it makes
> sense to abstract QCA, it doesn't take much co
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On November 10, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> Ok from talking more in IRC, it sounds like the idea is to have GPG
>> signing of qtscript plasmoids, and then allow them to use the features
>> they ask for. Unlike with C++, it can really be enfor
On November 10, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> Ok from talking more in IRC, it sounds like the idea is to have GPG
> signing of qtscript plasmoids, and then allow them to use the features
> they ask for. Unlike with C++, it can really be enforced that they
> only use the features they declare they need.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On November 9, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> I suspect the answer to the subject is "no" since I haven't found a
>> mention of a method to do it.
>
> "no" is correct.
>
>> But I also haven't found comprehensive
>> QtScript API docs. :)
>
> kdeba
On November 9, 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> I suspect the answer to the subject is "no" since I haven't found a
> mention of a method to do it.
"no" is correct.
> But I also haven't found comprehensive
> QtScript API docs. :)
kdebase/workspace/plasma/design/javascript has a growing body of informat
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 09 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
>> I suspect the answer to the subject is "no" since I haven't found a
>> mention of a method to do it. But I also haven't found comprehensive
>> QtScript API docs. :)
>
> well, the current bindings
On Monday 09 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> I suspect the answer to the subject is "no" since I haven't found a
> mention of a method to do it. But I also haven't found comprehensive
> QtScript API docs. :)
well, the current bindings are limited and "hand written", just have bindings
to the p
12 matches
Mail list logo
