Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-06-11 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 19:34:12 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > k. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that this > > > > kind of porting can be done with a script. > > > > i thin

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-06-11 Thread Marco Martin
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > >> k. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that this >> > > kind of porting can be done with a script. >> > >> > i think the branch is pretty much ready to go now >> >> Did

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-06-11 Thread Marco Martin
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > k. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that this > > > kind of porting can be done with a script. > > > > i think the branch is pretty much ready to go now > > Did you merge this one already? > no, not yet, didn't do any work o

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-06-11 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 20:07:55 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > i think they should go > > > > In a perfect world, yes. In the less perfect world we live in, it means > > more porting work. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that this > > ki

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-15 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > i think they should go > > In a perfect world, yes. In the less perfect world we live in, it means > more porting work. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that this > kind of porting can be done with a script. i think the branch is pret

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 17:53:18 you wrote: > > In a perfect world, yes. In the less perfect world we live in, it means > > more porting work. Not sure which is worse. I suppose, at least, that > > this kind of porting can be done with a script. > > unfortunately posting has to be dine anyways, sin

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 15:12:59 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Sunday, May 12, 2013 13:14:23 Marco Martin wrote: > > plasma.topEdge (notice the lower case) that plasma object would be a > > fugly :/ i'm not happy with the overly long "PlasmaCore.Types.TopEdge", but > i guess that's the lesser of evil

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-14 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday, May 12, 2013 13:14:23 Marco Martin wrote: > plasma.topEdge (notice the lower case) that plasma object would be a fugly :/ i'm not happy with the overly long "PlasmaCore.Types.TopEdge", but i guess that's the lesser of evils. > > > * Types name (or any other for what matters) is not p

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-12 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 12 May 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, May 10, 2013 19:44:09 Marco Martin wrote: > > After many experiments in varuious failing directions, i have the branch > > PlasmaTypesClass of palsma-framework > > de-duplication is terrific. > > it's still a draft state, i realize. the co

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-11 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, May 10, 2013 19:44:09 Marco Martin wrote: > After many experiments in varuious failing directions, i have the branch > PlasmaTypesClass of palsma-framework de-duplication is terrific. it's still a draft state, i realize. the code in plasma.h is inconsistent in a few ways (e.g. Directi

Re: Using plasma enums from QML2

2013-05-10 Thread Shantanu Tushar Jha
The cons don't seem very problematic, any other reasons why you don't like the approach? I guess the only other thing you can do is use strings, and that would suck even more :P On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > After many experiments in varuious failing direct