On Monday 27 April 2009, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> I´m working on a approval workflow system for KDE-Look.org. Aaron
> requested this feature already.
> I hope to have it ready in the next few weeks. So a moderator team can
> do a quality check for plasmoids in the future.
this is great news; tha
On Monday 27 April 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > Highest rated only means that people downloaded it.
> > A moderator(s) can also edit the description and fix grammar errors.
>
> a kde-look page is seen as "my page of my project" if this will no long
On Monday 27 April 2009, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Why is "write the plasmoid-authors via kde-look" not on the list of
> options?
because it would mean watching each and every submissions manually.
a request/approval queue would make sense. think "review board for 3rd party
contributions we give gh
On 27.04.2009, at 21:59, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I reported a KDE bug regarding the summary text of kde-look plasmoids
> that are appearing in the Add Plasmoids dialogue. Here is the bug:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190779
>
> The lead Plasma dev suggested that I write to this address wit
On Monday 27 April 2009 22:55:20 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2009, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > > I reported a KDE bug regarding the summary text of kde-look plasmoids
> > > that are appearing in the Add Plasmoids dialogue. Here is the bug:
On Monday 27 April 2009, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Highest rated only means that people downloaded it.
> A moderator(s) can also edit the description and fix grammar errors.
a kde-look page is seen as "my page of my project" if this will no longer be
true probably it would draw contributors away
>
Highest rated only means that people downloaded it.
A moderator(s) can also edit the description and fix grammar errors.
On Tuesday 28 April 2009 00:25:46 Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 22:41:27 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > How about not posting the "raw" plasmoids list from kde-loo
On Monday 27 April 2009 22:41:27 Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> How about not posting the "raw" plasmoids list from kde-look, but have it
> filtered by some admin?
Either this one becomes kind of a dictator. Or you are missing the fact that
there already is such a thing. Just sort the kde-look list not
Hi Dotan,
Thanks for your feedback on these applets. One of my main contributions in KDE
is that of proof-reading - I'm on the British English translation team, and one
of the main reasons it isn't done automatically is that it's 1% about putting
the u back into colour and 99% about proof-rea
On Monday 27 April 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > I reported a KDE bug regarding the summary text of kde-look plasmoids
> > that are appearing in the Add Plasmoids dialogue. Here is the bug:
>
> none of the plasmoids you mention come from the Plasma de
How about not posting the "raw" plasmoids list from kde-look, but have it
filtered by some admin?
Yes, we don't have man power for this.
Yes, this is a global KDE problem, not only a problem with plasmoids.
On Monday 27 April 2009 23:30:08 Alexis Ménard wrote:
> As Aaron said in the bug report,
On Monday 27 April 2009, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I reported a KDE bug regarding the summary text of kde-look plasmoids
> that are appearing in the Add Plasmoids dialogue. Here is the bug:
none of the plasmoids you mention come from the Plasma development team. they
are all third party add ons made a
As Aaron said in the bug report, it is provided by kde-look.
If you want something happen it should be on the website BEFORE they appear
online.
Can you propose us a solution (technical or not) for the KDE/Plasma side to
basically check if the content is ok? A spellchecker? A my
sentenceMakeSense
13 matches
Mail list logo
