On November 30, 2009 12:22:58 Andras Mantia wrote:
> Andreas Marschke wrote:
> > AFAIK the notifications do have a clickable cross in the upper corner and
> > a dragable title bar so basically no worries right?
>
> Happy clicking on them. :) Obviously that doesn't work if you have
> notifications
Andreas Marschke wrote:
> AFAIK the notifications do have a clickable cross in the upper corner and
> a dragable title bar so basically no worries right?
>
Happy clicking on them. :) Obviously that doesn't work if you have
notifications for mail folder or RSS feeds with fairly high traffic. You
On Monday 30 November 2009, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Marco Martin wrote:
> > true, the problem is that sophisticate communication like "the mail
> > associated to that notification has been read" is totally impossible in
> > the spec (and probably quite out of scope too, since it would require too
>
On Monday 30 November 2009 16:43:05 Andras Mantia wrote:
> Marco Martin wrote:
> > true, the problem is that sophisticate communication like "the mail
> > associated to that notification has been read" is totally impossible in
> > the spec (and probably quite out of scope too, since it would requir
Marco Martin wrote:
> true, the problem is that sophisticate communication like "the mail
> associated to that notification has been read" is totally impossible in
> the spec (and probably quite out of scope too, since it would require too
> much burden to the applications themselves, situation tha
On Monday 30 November 2009, Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't write a bug report, as this is not a bug in itself, just something
> that seems to be badly designed. Or maybe it is still unfinished, in that
> case ignore the mail.
> The idea of keeping the notifications visible for a longer t
