On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:35:25 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
wrote:
> k...@randomguy3.me.uk said the following at 12/24/2008 10:05 AM :
>> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:18:05 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
>> wrote:
>>> Since I saw ksysguard mentioned in this thread, I'd like to mention in
>>> passing that for me the killer
On Friday 26 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> So simply using used, cached and buffers should do the trick. I think this
> solution is good enough, agreed?
sounds sane to me, yes =)
btw, looks like you might have your first patch coming in soon:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172784
On Friday 26 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > Huhu,
> >
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > > > into my mind are System Status, System Load Watcher, System L
On Friday 26 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Huhu,
>
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > > into my mind are System Status, System Load Watcher, System Load
> > > Viewer, TimeMon, System Essentials, System Usage, ..
Huhu,
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > into my mind are System Status, System Load Watcher, System Load
> > Viewer, TimeMon, System Essentials, System Usage, ...
>
> System Load Viewer is quite straight forward and "says i
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 18:35:25 D. R. Evans wrote:
> k...@randomguy3.me.uk said the following at 12/24/2008 10:05 AM :
> > On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:18:05 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Since I saw ksysguard mentioned in this thread, I'd like to mention in
> >> passing that for me
On Wednesday 24 December 2008, k...@randomguy3.me.uk wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:18:05 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
>
> wrote:
> > Since I saw ksysguard mentioned in this thread, I'd like to mention in
> > passing that for me the killer feature in the KDE3 ksysguard applet is
>
> the
>
> > ability to
k...@randomguy3.me.uk said the following at 12/24/2008 10:05 AM :
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:18:05 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
> wrote:
>> Since I saw ksysguard mentioned in this thread, I'd like to mention in
>> passing that for me the killer feature in the KDE3 ksysguard applet is
> the
>> ability to mon
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:18:05 -0700, "D. R. Evans"
wrote:
> Since I saw ksysguard mentioned in this thread, I'd like to mention in
> passing that for me the killer feature in the KDE3 ksysguard applet is
the
> ability to monitor remote systems. That's one of the things I really,
> really miss in KD
Aaron J. Seigo said the following at 12/23/2008 11:17 AM :
> On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
>> into my mind are System Status, System Load Watcher, System Load Viewer,
>> TimeMon, System Essentials, System Usage, ...
>
> System Load Viewer is quite straight forward and "says i
On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> into my mind are System Status, System Load Watcher, System Load Viewer,
> TimeMon, System Essentials, System Usage, ...
System Load Viewer is quite straight forward and "says it all" IMHO. =) hope
to see this in 4.3!
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > So does it make sense to remove the data engines of [1] and [2] and try
> > to implement the applet by just using the above?
>
> i think so, yes.. the bonus there is that it will be as p
On Wednesday 10 December 2008, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> So does it make sense to remove the data engines of [1] and [2] and try to
> implement the applet by just using the above?
i think so, yes.. the bonus there is that it will be as portable as ksysguard
is.. =)
> PS: I don't want an applet th
13 matches
Mail list logo
