Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-12 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 13:08:37 Ozan Çağlayan wrote: > BTW: How long api.kde.org will stay unreachable? That's bad :( It'll be back up within days. In the meantime, you can use this file imported into Qt Assistant for API docs: http://mts.ms/kde45.qch (Edit -> Preferences -> Documentation ->

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-12 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
11 May 2010 Salı günü (saat 02:18:54) Aaron J. Seigo şunları yazmıştı: > > on the code side of it, some thoughts: I'm asking the following questions just for curiosity/gaining experience not that I'm insisting on the current code seen that the proper solution is still being discussed in this t

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-11 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 11 May 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > it would be nice to have a class in kdelibs that hides the "implementation > details" of how the OSD is called as well, so apps don't have to mess with > the dbus call itself. in fact, that OSD could even do something along the > lines of show a s

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On May 10, 2010, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: > I've been working to create a centralised way of rendering OSD widgets upon > request for KDE4. Finally I wrote a KDED service which uses KOSD[0] to > render OSD widgets. > > KOSD is a small KDE application which draws nice, polished and > plasma-themed OSD

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Markus
Am Montag 10 Mai 2010, 19:09:44 schrieb Ozan Çağlayan: > BTW should I commit and develop in trunk/playground? Does it only contain > parts that are *likely* to be merged to KDE SC or is it really a > completely free playground for KDE account owners? The latter. Extragear apps start in playground

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
Markus wrote: > Am Montag 10 Mai 2010, 14:43:29 schrieb Colin Guthrie: > > > @Ozan: > Do you already work on a KCM? I'd like to provide a few mockups, because I > already have some ideas in mind for the Notifications KCM (some are floating > in my mind for some time which are related to notifi

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Markus
Am Montag 10 Mai 2010, 14:43:29 schrieb Colin Guthrie: > So, personally, I think the "wasted space" argument isn't really overly > important in this context - use transparency and make sure it disappears > quickly and how big it is isn't massively important. In fact you could > say that the primar

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Ozan Çağlayan at 10/05/10 13:23 did gyre and gimble: > 10 May 2010 Pazartesi günü (saat 14:23:48) Markus şunları yazmıştı: >> While I like the idea, I think the current implementation wastes a but much >> space (icon is over to the progress bar, not beside it) and the progress >>

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
10 May 2010 Pazartesi günü (saat 14:23:48) Markus şunları yazmıştı: > While I like the idea, I think the current implementation wastes a but much > space (icon is over to the progress bar, not beside it) and the progress > bar is also not the Plasma one. Yes you are right. The layout can always be

Re: Shared OSD Service for KDE

2010-05-10 Thread Markus
While I like the idea, I think the current implementation wastes a but much space (icon is over to the progress bar, not beside it) and the progress bar is also not the Plasma one. PS: I added plasma-devel@kde.org as additional recipient. Am Montag 10 Mai 2010, 09:40:01 schrieb Ozan Çağlayan: >