---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125768/#review87346
---
Would it make sense to merge the call into our binary tool? So
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125768/
---
(Updated Oct. 24, 2015, 12:39 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125768/#review87332
---
Ship it!
Has been running this patch since some days..
- Bhu
> On Oct. 24, 2015, 3:40 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Or should we just depend on dbus-update-activation-environment?
dbus-update-activation-environment is just available on the recent version of
dbus, not sure of exact version but 1.10 and more.. So we will still need
ksyncdbusenv in c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125768/#review87322
---
Or should we just depend on dbus-update-activation-environment
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125768/#review87321
---
This is really needed. Just today I was looking into why
kglo
