> On Dec. 29, 2015, 1:36 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > this still seems to cause issues for some people.
> > May this series of patches be worth to push anyways?
>
> David Edmundson wrote:
> >this still seems to cause issues for some people.
>
> Where have you seen that?
> I do
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/
---
(Updated Dec. 29, 2015, 3:01 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On Dec. 29, 2015, 1:36 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > this still seems to cause issues for some people.
> > May this series of patches be worth to push anyways?
>
> David Edmundson wrote:
> >this still seems to cause issues for some people.
>
> Where have you seen that?
> I do
> On Dec. 29, 2015, 1:36 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > this still seems to cause issues for some people.
> > May this series of patches be worth to push anyways?
>this still seems to cause issues for some people.
Where have you seen that?
I don't recall seeing any bug reports.
- David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/#review90278
---
this still seems to cause issues for some people.
May this ser
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/#review81951
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On June 29, 2015, 7:15 a.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/#review81947
---
if that qml file is only supposed to be used in a plasmoid imp
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
>
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my
> update this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the
> applets were inconsistent so
> On June 29, 2015, 7:57 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > Was this causing an error?
Yes, most of the applets (see my other patches) were broken after my update
this week-end. I didn't update in a while previously. I noted that the applets
were inconsistent some using import "foo.js" (all brok
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/#review81845
---
Theoretically Plasma should automatically use the code directo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124204/#review81844
---
Was this causing an error?
- David Edmundson
On June 29, 20
16 matches
Mail list logo
