---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110633/
---
(Updated May 27, 2013, 7:59 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been disc
Am Samstag 25 Mai 2013, 10:19:37 schrieb Jekyll Wu:
> Well, DrKonqi uses Product.get API to fetch product information from
> bugs.kde.org, including all available versions (either active or disabled).
> But that is not the point of those "escaped" reports which shouldn't be
> accepted. Even if DrK
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don'
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote:
> > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled
> > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create
> > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you
> > don
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110633/#review33110
---
Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt again
14 matches
Mail list logo