> On July 19, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > thanks, wouldn;t have remembered ;)
> >
> > the changes seems good, but i'm not sure about giving kickoff a copy of the
> > tabbar.
> >
> > any reason this is not proposed as a patch for the tabbar component itself?
>
> Greg T wrote:
>
> On July 19, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > thanks, wouldn;t have remembered ;)
> >
> > the changes seems good, but i'm not sure about giving kickoff a copy of the
> > tabbar.
> >
> > any reason this is not proposed as a patch for the tabbar component itself?
>
> Greg T wrote:
>
> On July 19, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > thanks, wouldn;t have remembered ;)
> >
> > the changes seems good, but i'm not sure about giving kickoff a copy of the
> > tabbar.
> >
> > any reason this is not proposed as a patch for the tabbar component itself?
>
> Greg T wrote:
>
> On July 19, 2012, 9:04 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > thanks, wouldn;t have remembered ;)
> >
> > the changes seems good, but i'm not sure about giving kickoff a copy of the
> > tabbar.
> >
> > any reason this is not proposed as a patch for the tabbar component itself?
Of course I could do t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105405/#review16118
---
If you ask me, i like the "old" view better with the elided tex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105405/#review16103
---
thanks, wouldn;t have remembered ;)
the changes seems good, bu
> On July 3, 2012, 8:34 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > please push it again after Akademy - I doubt that I find the time to
> > properly read through it in this week
well *push* :)
any ideas?
- Greg
---
This is an automatically genera
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105405/#review15332
---
please push it again after Akademy - I doubt that I find the ti
